Sensitivity of the Seismic Response of Long Medieval Walls to Earthquake and Material Uncertainty

Abstract:

The scope of this paper is to illustrate a strategy for assessing the seismic performance of medieval city walls with emphasis on the Byzantine Walls of the city of Thessaloniki. Despite the relatively simple structural system of such structures, their response under earthquake excitation in 3D space and in the time domain, has not yet been adequately studied primarily due to the lack of efficient numerical tools, the high computational cost associated and the uncertainty related to the spatial variation of material properties and seismic input motion characteristics. Nowadays, the advances in scientific knowledge and the increase in computational power, the ability to efficiently conduct sensitivity analyses and the deeper knowledge of earthquake engineering aspects, provides the opportunity for a more refined simulation and study; however, such approach still remains heavy enough and as such, unsuitable for all practical purposes. Along these lines, a comprehensive computational framework is established and presented herein that aims at quantifying the relative importance of the uncertainty associated with modeling parameters, structural and soil material properties, as well as the earthquake ground motion selection process and application assumptions, the latter refering to the consideration of different angles of incidence of the incoming seismic wavefield and the spatially variable nature of ground motion that excites asynchronously the particularly long historic structures. It is foressen that this detailed 3D dynamic analysis will assist in identifing the relative impact of earthquake characteristics and material properties, permit justified simplifications and facilitate the overall process undertaken by the authors to assess the seismic history of the city of Thessaloniki through a set of detailed back analyses of well-selected parts of the extended wall cirquit.

• Periodical: Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 133-134)
• Pages: 689-695
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.133-134.689
• Online since: October 2010
• Authors: Anastasios Sextos, Kosmas Athanasios Stylianidis, Konstantinos Mykoniou
• Keywords: Angle of Incidendce of Seismic Waves, Byzantine Walls, Mechanical Property, Spatial Variability of Earthquake Ground Motion

References

[1] Ambraseys, N, Smit, P, Berardi, R, Rinaldis, D, Cotton, and F, Berge, C (2000).

[2] Anastasiadis, A, Raptakis, D, and Pitilakis, K (2001). Thessaloniki's Detailed Microzoning: Subsurface Structure as basis for Site Response Analysis., Pure and Applied Geophysics - Pageoph, 158(12), 2597-2633.

DOI: 10.1007/pl00001188

[3] ANSYS Engineering Analysis System (2005). User and Theoretical Manual. ANSYS, Inc., Southpointe, Canonsburg, Pennsylvania, Version 10. 0.

[4] Burdette, N J, Elnashai, A S, Lupoi, A, and Sextos, A G (2008). The effect of asynchronous earthquake motion on complex bridges. Part 1: Methodology and input motion., Journal of Bridge Engineering, ASCE, 13(2), 158-165.

DOI: 10.1061/(asce)1084-0702(2008)13:2(158)

[5] Der Kiureghian, A, and Neuenhofer, A (1992). Response Spectrum method for multiple support excitations., Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 21: 713-740.

DOI: 10.1002/eqe.4290210805

[6] Elgamal, A, Yang, Z, and Parra, E (2002). Computational Modeling of Cyclic Mobility and Post-Liquefaction Site Response., Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 22(4), 259271.

DOI: 10.1016/s0267-7261(02)00022-2

[7] NTC (2008) Norme Tecniche per le Costruzioni., D.M. 14 gennaio (2008).

[8] Sextos A, Kappos A, and Pitilakis K (2003b). Inelastic dynamic analysis of RC bridges accounting for spatial variability of ground motion, site effects and soil-structure interaction phenomena. Part 2: Parametric study., Earthquake Eng. & Structural Dynamics, 32: 629-652.

DOI: 10.1002/eqe.242

[9] Sextos, A, and Kappos, A (2008). Seismic response of bridges under asynchronous excitation and comparison with EC8 design rules., Bulletin of Earthquake Eng., 7, 519-545.

DOI: 10.1007/s10518-008-9090-5

[10] Sextos, A, Pitilakis, K, and Kappos, A (2003a). A global approach for dealing with spatial variability, site effects and soil-structure-interaction for non-linear bridges: Part 1: Methodology and analytical tools., Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 32: 607629.

DOI: 10.1002/eqe.241

[11] Stylianidis, K, and Sextos, A (2009). Back analysis of Thessaloniki Byzantine Land Walls as a means to assess its Seismic History., International Journal of Architectural Heritage, 3(4), 123.

DOI: 10.1080/15583050902862752

[12] Tubino, F, Carassale, L, and Giovanni, S (2003). Seismic response of multi-supported structures by proper orthogonal decomposition., Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 32: 1639-1654.

DOI: 10.1002/eqe.292