Effect of Reinforcements on the Ultraprecision Performance of SiC Reinforced Aluminium Matrix Composites

Article Preview

Abstract:

The experiments on ultraprecision turning of SiC reinforced aluminium composites have been done by using polycrystalloid diamond (PCD) tool with the three-dimensional cutting forces measured with a Kistler dynamometer, the quality of the machined surfaces was examined under Atom Force Microscope (AFM) and Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM) and the roughness of the machined surfaces was measured with roughometer of Talysurf-6. The experimental results show that the quality of the machined surfaces of SiC reinforced aluminium composites is predominantly controlled by the deformation mechanisms of SiC reinforcements, and the quality of the machined surfaces is better when reinforcements deform in the form of direct cutoff than in the form of pullout. The higher the volume fraction of SiC reinforcements, the worse the quality of the machined surfaces and the greater the amplitude of vibration and the average value of the cutting forces. On the same condition of volume fraction and cutting, the quality of the machined surfaces of SiC whiskers reinforced aluminium matrix composites is better than that of SiC particles reinforced aluminium matrix composites.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 154-155)

Pages:

1342-1347

Citation:

Online since:

October 2010

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2011 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] D.Z. Wang: Study of cutting performance and mechanism of discontinuous reinforced aluminum composite [D]. Harbin: Harbin Institute of Technology, 2001(in Chinese).

Google Scholar

[2] D.Z. Wang, P.F. Feng, Q.L. Zhao: Journal of Astronautics, 2006, Vol. 27(6): pp.1341-1346 (in Chinese).

Google Scholar

[3] D.Z. Wang, R.D. Han, H.M. Liu: Tribology, 2005, Vol. 25(6), pp.569-573 (in Chinese).

Google Scholar

[4] J.E. Caroline, S. Andrewes: Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 2000, Vol. 102, pp.25-29.

Google Scholar

[5] K. Weinert K. Annals of the CIRP, 1993, Vol. 42(1), pp.95-98.

Google Scholar

[6] L. Luliano, L. Settineri, A. Gatto. Composites Part A, 1998, Vol. 29A, pp.1501-1509.

Google Scholar

[7] E. Kilichap, O. Cakir, M. Aksoy: Journal of Material Processing Technology, 2005, Vol. 164-165, pp.862-867.

Google Scholar

[8] N. Tomac, K. Tonnessen: Journal of CIRP, 1992, Vol. 41, pp.55-58.

Google Scholar

[9] M.E. Gallab, M. Sklad: Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 1998, Vol. 83, pp.151-158.

Google Scholar

[10] R.M. Hooper, J.L. Henshall, A. Klopfer: Internal Journal of Refractory Metals and Hard Materials, 1999, Vol. 17, pp.103-109.

Google Scholar

[11] M.E. Gallab, M. Sklad: Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 2000, Vol. 101, pp.10-20.

Google Scholar

[12] W.W. Cool: Material Science and Technology, 1998, Vol. 14, pp.892-895.

Google Scholar

[13] Y.M. Quan, Y.B. YE: Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 2003, Vol. 138, pp.464-467.

Google Scholar

[14] M.E. Gallab, M. Sklad: Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 2004, Vol. 152, pp.23-34.

Google Scholar

[15] M.E. Gallab, M. Sklad: Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 1998, Vol. 83, pp.277-285.

Google Scholar

[16] Z.J. Yuan, L. Geng: Annals of the CIRP, 1993, Vol. 42(1), pp.107-109.

Google Scholar

[17] T. Ozben, E. Kilickap, O. Cakir: Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 2008, Vol. 198(1-3), pp.220-225.

Google Scholar

[18] K. Palanikumar, N. Muthukrishnan, K.S. Hariprasad: Machining Science and Technology, 2008, Vol. 12(4), pp.529-545.

Google Scholar

[19] K.C. Chan, C.F. Cheung: International Journal of Mechanical Sciences, 2001, Vol. 43, p.2047-(2068).

Google Scholar