Electrode Classification and Retrieval Using Supported Vector Machine

Article Preview

Abstract:

Due to the similarities between electrode model and their CNC machining process, process design could be finished efficiently using the electrode automatic classification system as well as the existed standard process template. This study developed an automatic classification retrieval system of electrode model by applying a statistical approach, namely SVM model, to the classification of electrode model, where 3D Polar-Radius Surface Moment was used to extract the feature vector of the electrode model. Experiments showed a promising result with an average classification accuracy up to 85.72% in addition to the high efficiency and usability. Most important, the developed approach is capable of reusing existing knowledge and experience and as a result it makes the CNC programming process easier.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 160-162)

Pages:

743-749

Citation:

Online since:

November 2010

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2011 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] L. Breiman, J.H. Friedman, R. Olshen, et al: Classification and Regression Trees. (Chapman & Hall, New York 1984).

Google Scholar

[2] J.R. Quinlan: Discovering rules by induction form large collection of examples. (Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh UK 1990).

Google Scholar

[3] Biao Qin, Yuni Xia, Sunil Prabhakar, et al. A Rule-Based Classification Algorithm for Uncertain Data. IEEE International Conference on Data Engineering, 2009, pp.1633-1640.

DOI: 10.1109/icde.2009.164

Google Scholar

[4] O. Dolu, K. Kirtac, M. Gokmen. Ensembled gabor nearest neighbor classifier for face recognition. International Symposium on Computer and Information Sciences, 2009, pp.99-104.

DOI: 10.1109/iscis.2009.5291860

Google Scholar

[5] P. Langley, W. Iba, K. Thompson. An analysis of Bayesian classifiers. National Conf. on Artigicial Intelligence, 1992, pp.223-228.

Google Scholar

[6] A.S. Tokar, P.A. Johnson. Rainfall-runoff modeling using Artificial neural networks. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, Vol. 4(1999), pp.223-239.

DOI: 10.1061/(asce)1084-0699(1999)4:3(232)

Google Scholar

[7] Vapnik V.N. The Nature of Statistical Learning Theory, 2nd edition. (Springer-Verlag, New York, 1999).

Google Scholar

[8] Pu Jiantao, Liu Yi, Xin Guyu, et al. 3D Model Retrieval Based on 2D Slice Similarity Measurements. Proceedings of the 2nd International Symposium on 3DPVT, 2004, pp.95-101.

DOI: 10.1109/tdpvt.2004.1335181

Google Scholar

[9] Yi Liu, Jiantao Pu, Hongbin Zha, et al. Thickness histogram and statistical harmonic representation for 3D model retrieval. Proceedings of the 2nd International Symposium on 3DPVT, 2004, pp.896-903.

DOI: 10.1109/tdpvt.2004.1335410

Google Scholar

[10] D.V. Vranic, D. Saupe. Description of 3D-shape using a complex function on the sphere. Proc. IEEE International Conference on Multimedia and Expo, 2002, pp.177-180.

DOI: 10.1109/icme.2002.1035747

Google Scholar

[11] Li Zong-Min, YU Guang-Bin, LIU Yu-jie, et al. 3D Polar-Radius-Invariant-Moments and Their Application to 3D Model Retrieval. PR & AI, China, Vol. 19(2006), pp.362-367. (In Chinese).

Google Scholar

[12] LI Zong-Min, LIU Yu-Jie, LI Hua. 3D Model Retrieval Based on Polar-Radius Surface Moment Invariants. Journal of Software, China, Vol. 18(2007), pp.71-76(In Chinese).

Google Scholar

[13] Reddi S.S. Radial and angular moment invariants for images identification. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, Vol. 3(1981), pp.240-242.

DOI: 10.1109/tpami.1981.4767087

Google Scholar

[14] Powell M J D., in: The theory of Radial basis functions approximation, edit by W A Light, Advances in Numerical Analysis Volume II: Wavelets, Subdivision algorithms and radial basis functions, Oxford University, pp.105-210(1990).

DOI: 10.2307/2153129

Google Scholar

[15] B.E. Boser, I. Guyon, V. Vapnik. A training algorithm for optimal margin classifiers. Proceedings of the Fifth Annual Workshop on Computational Learning Theory, ACM Press, 1992, pp.144-152.

DOI: 10.1145/130385.130401

Google Scholar

[16] D. Anguita, S. ridella, F. Rivieccio, R. Zunino. Hyperparameter design criteria for support vector classifiers. Neurocomputing, Vol. 55(2003), pp.109-134.

DOI: 10.1016/s0925-2312(03)00430-2

Google Scholar

[17] K. Duan, S.S. Keerthi, A.N. Poo. Evaluation of simple performance measures for tuning SVM hyperparameters. Neurocomputing, Vol. 51(2003), pp.41-59.

DOI: 10.1016/s0925-2312(02)00601-x

Google Scholar

[18] S.S. Keerthi. Efficient Tuning of SVM Hyperparameters Using Radius/Margin Bound and Iterative Algorithms. Neural Networks, Vol. 13(2002), pp.1225-1229.

DOI: 10.1109/tnn.2002.1031955

Google Scholar