Research of Stress Concentration and Retrofitted Methods for Orthotropic Steel Bridge Decks

Article Preview

Abstract:

In this paper, the stress distribution of the orthotropic steel bridge deck in a suspend bridge under local wheel load is analyzed. Some retrofitted methods are introduced, two of which are studied. One is using the concrete paving layer (CPL), and the other is using the sandwich plate system (SPS) to strengthen the orthotropic steel bridge deck. Local finite element models are established by ANSYS; stress distribution of bridge deck is calculated under the designed vehicle load before and after the deck retrofitted by the CPL or the SPS, and the results are compared with each other. The analysis results indicate that, under wheel pressure load, the orthotropic steel deck appears stress concentration; after the deck was retrofitted no matter by the CPL or the SPS, all the stress peaks decrease obviously, and the fatigue resistance of the orthotropic steel deck increases, which indicate that the two methods are effective to retrofit the orthotropic steel bridge deck. Using the CPL method can lead to lower stress concentration than that of using the SPS method, but the concrete paving layer is easy to crack, so, high performance concrete with high tension strength is needed.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 163-167)

Pages:

3511-3516

Citation:

Online since:

December 2010

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2011 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Jun-Hyeok Choi, Do-Hwan Kim. Stress characteristics and fatigue crack behavior of the longitudinal rib-to-cross beam joints in an orthotropic steel deck [J]. Advances in structural engineering, 11(2) (2008), pp.189-198.

DOI: 10.1260/136943308784466224

Google Scholar

[2] Wolchuck R. Lessons from weld cracks in orthotropic decks on three European bridges. Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE. 116(1) (1990), pp.75-84.

DOI: 10.1061/(asce)0733-9445(1990)116:1(75)

Google Scholar

[3] Chitoshi Miki, Fatigue Damage in Orthotropic Steel Bridge Decks and Retrofit Works, Steel Structure, 6 (2006), pp.255-267.

Google Scholar

[4] Jong, F.B.P. Renovation Techniques for Fatigue Cracked Orthotropic Steel Bridge Decks (D), Delft University of Technology (2007).

Google Scholar

[5] Peter Buitelaar, René Braam, High Performance Concrete Overlay for Rehabilitation and Strengthening of Orthotropic Steel Bridge Decks, the 7th International Conference on Short and Medium Span Bridges, Montreal, Canada, 14 (2006), pp.1-10.

Google Scholar

[6] Jong, F.B.P., and Kolstein, M.H. Strenghening a bridge deck with high performance concrete. Proc., Orthotropic Bridge Conf., ASCE, Reston, Va (2004), pp.328-347.

Google Scholar

[7] SPS Overlay for Bridge Decks [P]. England. Suggested model fabrication and test programme. 3184851. (2008).

Google Scholar

[8] D.J.L. Kennedy, R.A. Dorton, S.D.B. Alexander. The sandwich plate system for bridge decks [J]. Presented to the 2002 International Bridge Conference (2002), pp.1-11.

Google Scholar

[9] LI, Y. S., CUI. C. L., WANG, Y. Q., PAN, P. Stress Distribution of Orthotropic Steel Bridge Decks Under Vehicle Wheel Loading. Proceedings of the Nineteenth International Offshore and Polar Engineering Conference. Osaka, Japan (2009), pp.258-262.

Google Scholar

[10] He Hua-nan, Huang Cheng-kui. Calculation of Tensile Strength of Self-stressing Concrete Reinforced with Steel Bar and Fiber [J]. Journal of Building Materials, 5(1) (2002), pp.32-36.

Google Scholar

[11] Jackie Voo, Stephen J. Foster, R. Ian Gilbert and N. Gowripalan. Design of disturbed regions in Reactive Powder Concrete bridge girders [J]. Bridge Materials (2001), pp.117-127.

DOI: 10.1061/40691(2003)11

Google Scholar