Recent Development in Analytical Models for Earthquake-Induced Pounding between Adjacent Bridge Structures

Article Preview

Abstract:

Recent development in analytical models on earthquake-induced pounding between adjacent bridge decks are introduced. The bridge damage induced by seismic pounding in recent 30 years strong earthquakes are reviewed, various analytical models used to simulate impact effect between bridge decks are presented, which include impact-restitution approach and contact-element approach. The contact-element approach include the linear spring element model, Kelvin-Voigt element model, Hertz model, Hertz-damp model and updated Hertz-damp model. The areas required to further investigate are proposed.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 163-167)

Pages:

4244-4250

Citation:

Online since:

December 2010

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2011 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Fan Lichu. China Civil Engineering Journal, 1981,14(2):41-51. (in Chinese).

Google Scholar

[2] Li Qiao, Zhao Shichun. Engineering Seismic Damage Analysis during the Wen Chuan Earthquake[M]. Chengdu:Publishing House of Southwest Jiaotong university, 2008. (in Chinese).

Google Scholar

[3] S.A. Anagnostopoulos and K.V. Spiliopoulos. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 1992, 21(4): 289-302.

Google Scholar

[4] J. Azevedo, R. Bento. Design criteria for buildings subjected to pounding. Eleventh World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Acapulco, Mexico, 23-28 June (1996).

Google Scholar

[5] P. Zhu, M. Abe, Y. Fujino. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 2002, 31(11): 1891-(1913).

Google Scholar

[6] M. Papadrakakis, H. Mouzakis, N. Plevris, and S. Bitzarakis. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics. 1991, 20(11): 981-998.

DOI: 10.1002/eqe.4290201102

Google Scholar

[7] C.J. Athanassiadou, G.G. Penelis and A.J. Kappos. Earthquake Spectra. 1994, 10(2): 293-317.

Google Scholar

[8] P.K. Malhotra. Journal of Engineering Mechanics, ASCE, 1998, 124(7): 794-802.

Google Scholar

[9] B.F. Maison and K. Kasai. Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE, 1990, 116(4): 957-975.

Google Scholar

[10] B.F. Maison and K. Kasai. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 1992, 21(9): 771-786.

Google Scholar

[11] A. Filiatrault, P. Wagner and S. Cherry. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 1995, 24(8): 1131-1154.

DOI: 10.1002/eqe.4290240807

Google Scholar

[12] R. Jankowski, K. Wilde, Y. Fujino. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 2000, 29(2): 195-212.

Google Scholar

[13] S. -H. Kim, M. Shinozuka. Journal of Engineering Mechanics, ASCE, 2003, 129(11): 1225-1234.

Google Scholar

[14] S.A. Anagnostopoulos. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 1988, 16(3): 443-456.

Google Scholar

[15] R. Jankowski, K. Wilde and Y. Fujino. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 1998, 27(5):487-502.

Google Scholar

[16] Wang Dongsheng, Feng Qimin, Wang guoxin. Engineering Mechanics, 2004, 21(2): 157-166. (in Chinese).

Google Scholar

[17] Wang Dongsheng, Wang guoxin, Feng Qimin. Engineering Mechanics, 2004, 21(4): 81-85. (in Chinese).

Google Scholar

[18] W. Goldsmith. Impact: the theory and physical behavior of colliding solids, 1st edn., Edward Arnold: London, U.K., (1960).

Google Scholar

[19] K.L. Johnson. Contact Mechanics. Cambridge University Press, (1985).

Google Scholar

[20] J.G.M. Van Mier, A.F. Pruijssers, H.W. Rienhardt and T. Monnier. Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE, 1991, 117(2): 354-374.

Google Scholar

[21] R.O. Davis. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 1992, 21(3): 253-274.

Google Scholar

[22] H. -S. Jing, M. Young. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 1991, 20(7): 667-681.

Google Scholar

[23] C.P. Pantelides, X. Ma. Computers and Structures, 1998, 66(1): 79-92.

Google Scholar

[24] K.T. Chau, X.X. Wei. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics. 2001, 30(5): 633-651.

Google Scholar

[25] K.T. Chau, X.X. Wei, X. Guo and C.Y. Shen. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 2003, 32(4): 537-554.

Google Scholar

[26] S. Muthukumar, R.A. DesRoches. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 2006, 35(7): 811-828.

Google Scholar

[27] S.A. Muthukumar. Contact element approach with hysteresis damping for the analysis and design of pounding in bridges. Ph.D. Dissertation, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, (2003).

Google Scholar

[28] Li Zhongxian, Yue Fuqing, Zhou Li. Engineering Mechanics,2008,25(4):128-132. (in Chinese).

Google Scholar

[29] Jankowski R. Non-linear viscoelastic model of structural pounding. 13th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Vancouver, Canada, 1-6 August, (2004).

Google Scholar

[30] Jankowski R. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 2005, 34(6): 595-611.

Google Scholar

[31] Jankowski R. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 2006, 35(4): 517-524.

Google Scholar