Effect of Pounding at Expansion Joints on Seismic Response of Long-Span Suspension Bridge under Strong Earthquakes

Article Preview

Abstract:

For a long-span suspension bridge, owing to a flexible structure system, the seismic displacement at the end of the deck may severely exceed the allowance under earthquake which due to the occurrence of the pound between the main span and the approach span usually which can causes the collision of falling-beams and structures. In this paper, based on the pounding phenomenon at expansion joints of long-span suspension bridge under strong earthquake and employing a typical long-span suspension bridges. With the time history analysis method of determining the nonlinear seismic responses, the pounding effects of adjacent girders at expansion joints on seismic responses of long-span cable-stayed bridge were studied. The results indicate that pounding can amplify the seismic demand of piers of the approach span and can also amplify the displacement of beam of the approach span, the relative displacement between main span and approach span and the hinge seat width of beam of approach span obviously and it causes easily the collision of falling-beams and structures under earthquakes.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 163-167)

Pages:

4373-4377

Citation:

Online since:

December 2010

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2011 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Praveen K. Malhotra. Journal of Engineering Mechanics/July 1998: 794-802.

Google Scholar

[2] Nawawi Chouw, Hong Hao. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, Vol. 25, 2005, 717–728.

Google Scholar

[3] Robert Jankowski, Krzysztof Wilde and Yozo Fujino. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics. 2000, 29: 195-212.

Google Scholar

[4] Anat Ruangrassamee and Kazuhiko Kawashima. 2001, 30: 1511-1538.

Google Scholar

[5] OpenSees Command Language Manual, Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California, Berkeley, OpenSees version 1. 7. 3. (2007).

Google Scholar