Experimental Study on the Compressive Behavior of Concrete Encased in CFRP Tubes

Article Preview

Abstract:

Fiber reinforced polymer (FRP) tube-encased concrete columns represent a formwork-free, steel-free, and corrosion-resistant alternative for a construction of a new infrastructure. In this study, a total of nine square concrete columns with cross-section of 200mm×200mm and height of 600mm including six confined concrete encased in CFRP tubes and three unconfined concrete as control specimens are prepared. The tubes with fibers oriented at 90° from axial direction are manufactured to have 3 or 5 plies of CFRP with 10mm, 20mm, or 40mm rounding corner radius. To ensure proper bond, a 100mm overlap is provided in the direction of fibers. Uniaxial compressive tests are conducted to investigate the axial strength, compressive behavior, stress-strain relationship, and ductility of them throughout the loading history until the CFRP tubes rupture. It is evident that in all cases, the CFRP tube confinement can improve the behavior of unconfined concrete, in terms of axial compressive strength or axial deformability. Test results have shown that the stress-strain behavior of confined specimens vary with different confinement parameters, such as the level of confinement (3-ply and 5-ply), corner radius at vertical edges (10, 20 and 40 mm).

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 168-170)

Pages:

1335-1341

Citation:

Online since:

December 2010

Authors:

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2011 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Fardis MN, and Khalili H. Mag. of Concrete Res. Vol. 34(1982), pp.191-202.

Google Scholar

[2] Mander JB, Priestley MN, and Park R. J. Struct. Eng. Vol. 114(1988), p.1804–1826.

Google Scholar

[3] Saadatmanesh H, Ehsani MR, and Li MW. ACI Struct. J. Vol. 91(1994), pp.434-447.

Google Scholar

[4] Seible F, Preistley N, Hegemier GA and Innamorato D. J. Compos. Constr., Vol. 1(1997), pp.52-62.

Google Scholar

[5] Samaan, M., Mirmiran, A., and Sahawy. M. J Struct Eng. Vol. 124(1998), pp.1025-1031.

Google Scholar

[6] Toutanji H, and Houssam A. ACI Mater. J. Vol. 96(1999) pp.397-404.

Google Scholar

[7] Lam L and Teng J.G. J. Struct Eng. Vol. 128(2002), pp.612-623.

Google Scholar

[8] Teng J.G., and Lam L. J. Struc. Eng. Vol. 130(2004), pp.1713-1723.

Google Scholar

[9] Binici B. J. Engrn. Struct., Vol. 27(2005), pp.1040-1051.

Google Scholar

[10] Mirmiran A, Shahawy M, Samaan M. and El Echary H. J. Compos. Constr. Vol. 2(1998), pp.175-85.

Google Scholar

[11] Nanni A. and Bradford M.N. Constr. Build. Mat. Vol. 9(1995), pp.115-124.

Google Scholar

[12] Mirmiran A. and Shahawy. Compos. Part B Vol. 27(1996), p.263–268.

Google Scholar

[13] Mirmiran A. and Shahawy M. Mech. of Cohesive-Frictional Mat., Int. J. Vol. 2(1997), pp.237-249.

Google Scholar

[14] Xiao Y. and Wu H. J. Mater. Civ. Engng Vol. 12 (2000), p.139–46.

Google Scholar

[15] Pessiki S, Harries K. A, Kestner J, Sause R. and Ricles J.M. J. Compos. Constr., Vol. 5(2001), pp.237-245.

DOI: 10.1061/(asce)1090-0268(2001)5:4(237)

Google Scholar

[16] Information on http: /www. basf-cc. com. au.

Google Scholar