Fuzzy Comprehensive Evaluation of Graduate Education Quality Based on AHP

Abstract:

Based on ahp, the fuzzy mathematical theory, combined with the background knowledge has established the postgraduate education quality analytic hierarchy model, and using this model study postgraduate education quality evaluation question. Take the graduate student factor, the teacher factor, the school factor and the external factor as the foundation variables ,has established the usability fuzzy evaluation indexes of membership functions ,integrating the analytical hierarchy process (ahp) gives evaluation criteria on the relative weight of evaluation target, finally uses the fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method to give the scientific evaluation to the graduate education quality.

• Periodical: Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 171-172)
• Pages: 663-666
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.171-172.663
• Online since: December 2010
• Authors: Yan Si, Na Chao, Xiao Qing Ma
• Keywords: Analysis Hierarchy Process (AHP), Fuzzy Comprehensive Evaluation (FCE), Graduated Education Quality

References

[1] Pan Maoyuan. Higher education popularity education quality view. The Tsinghua University educates the research, 2004(1): 36-38.

[2] Helena Aittola. Doctoral Education and Doctoral Theses - Changing Assessment Practices. Cultural Perspectives on Higher Education. 2008(1).

DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4020-6604-7_11

[3] Saaty T L. The Analytic Hierarchy Process . Pittsburgh, PA: RWS Publications, (2000).

[4] Xu Shubai. Analytic hierarchy process principle. Tianjin: Tianjin University Publishing house, (1988).

[5] Kwiesielewicz M. Uden E. Inconsistent and contradictory judgments in pairwise comparison method in the AHP. Computers & Operations Research. 2004(5).

DOI: 10.1016/s0305-0548(03)00022-4

[6] Ana Lilia Laureano-Cruces, Javier Ramírez-Rodríguez, Amador Terán-Gilmore. Evaluation of the Teaching-Learning Process with Fuzzy Cognitive Maps. Springer Berlin. (2004).

DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-30498-2_92

[7] Du, Pang Qinghua, Wu inflammation. Modern quality synthetic evaluation method and case selection (the 2nd edition). Beijing: Tsinghua University publishing house, 2008. Table 1 The relative weight of postgraduate education quality evaluation index Rule layer index Index layer index Graduate factors.

3813 Sense of responsibility and moral level Openly published levels Excellent quality ratio degree thesis Winning the competition level Foreign language level.

0625.

0860.

1093.

0763.

0472 Tutor factors.

2825 Mentor age and title Mentor degree structure Teacher and student student-staff ratio The academic level of teacher and characteristics Working attitude responsibility of the mentor.

0268.

0442.

0277.

0952.

0414 school-related factor.

1269 Training plan, courses, teaching methods, the scientificity of management mechanism Disciplinary level, the academic atmosphere All laboratory equipment Discipline funds.

0260.

0493.

0154.

0181 Social factors.

2093 Employment rate after Graduating three months The weighted average wage after graduating three years Employ persons satisfaction.

0890.

0681.

0522.