Comparative Study of Structure and Pickling Characteristics of Oxide Scale Formed on Strips Produced by TSCR and Conventional Process

Article Preview

Abstract:

The microstructure and pickling characteristics of oxide scale formed on hot-rolled SPHC steel strip produced by different processes were investigated based on structure observation, weight loss and corrosion potential measurements. The results show that the scale formed on strip produced by TSCR consists of mainly magnetite (Fe3O4) and little wustite (FeO), hematite (Fe2O3), and that in conventional process is composed mainly wustite (FeO) and little magnetite (Fe3O4), hematite (Fe2O3). The shape of the open-circuit potential transient is determined crucially by the oxide scale structure. Time to reach a steady-state value of open-circuit potential of strip produced by TSCR is longer than that in conventional process. Both the stability of the scale in pickling solution and the effectiveness of descaling could be evaluated and predicted by measuring the change of electrochemical potential during acid pickling.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 228-229)

Pages:

77-82

Citation:

Online since:

April 2011

Authors:

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2011 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] R.M. Hudson and C.J. Warning: Met. Finish, Vol. 78 (1980), p.21.

Google Scholar

[2] R.M. Hudson and C.J. Warning: J. Met., Vol. 34 (1982), p.65.

Google Scholar

[3] L.F. Li, P. Caenen and M. Daerden et al: Corros. Sci., Vol. 47 (2005), p.1307.

Google Scholar

[4] R. Y. Chen and W. Y. D. Yuen: Oxid. Met., Vol. 53 (2000), p.539.

Google Scholar

[5] S. Y. Cheng, C. T. Juan and S. L. Kuan: Oxid. Met., Vol. 60 (2003), p.409.

Google Scholar

[6] V. V. Basabe and J. A. Szpunar: ISIJ In. t, Vol. 44 (2004), p.1554.

Google Scholar

[7] S. D. Bakshi, M. Dutta and Bhattacharjee D et al: ISIJ Int., Vol. 45 (2005), p.1368.

Google Scholar

[8] R. Bhattacharya, G. Jha and S. Kundu et al: Surf. Coat. Technol., Vol. 201 (2006), p.526.

Google Scholar

[9] R. Y. Chen and W. Y. D. Yuen: ISIJ Int., Vol. 45 (2005), p.52.

Google Scholar

[10] J. S Sheasby, W.E. Boggs and E. T. Turkdogan: Met. Sci., Vol. 18 (1984), p.127.

Google Scholar

[11] F. I. Wei: Anti-Corros Method. M., Vol. 35 (1988), p.4.

Google Scholar

[12] R. Y. Chen and W. Y. D. Yuen: Iron Steelmaker, Vol. 27 (2000), p.47.

Google Scholar

[13] I. H. Plonski: Corrosion, Vol. 47 (1991), p.840.

Google Scholar

[14] C. M. A. Brett: Corros. Sci., Vol. 33 (1992), p.203.

Google Scholar

[15] P. Y. Park and E. Akiyama: Corros. Sci., Vol. 36 (1994), p.1395.

Google Scholar

[16] K. M. Ismail, A. Jayaraman and T. K. Wood et al: Electrochim. Acta., Vol. 44 (1999), p.4685.

Google Scholar

[17] A. A Ei-Meligi and S. Turgoose: Corrosion, Vol. 35 (2000), p.75.

Google Scholar

[18] K. H. Na, S. I. Pyun and J. J. Park et al: Corrosion, Vol. 59(2003), p.146.

Google Scholar

[19] P. H. Bolt: Steel Res., Vol. 75 (2004), p.399.

Google Scholar

[20] M. M. Wolf: Iron Steelmaker, Vol. 27 (2000), p.65.

Google Scholar