A Re-Examination of the Toughness and Fatigue Performance of PM Steels

Article Preview

Abstract:

It is now fairly well established that to achieve low values of the Paris exponent for the growth of fatigue cracks in PM steels, high values of fracture toughness are required. Fracture toughness is related to other measures of toughness, such as impact tests and the mechanical work that the material can absorb before fracturing. All of these are functions of the basic ductility of the material. A coherent picture of all these inter-relationships is presented.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

47-50

Citation:

Online since:

October 2007

Authors:

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2007 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] J.R. Moon: Powder Metallurgy Progress, Vol. 2 (2002), p.63.

Google Scholar

[2] J.R. Moon: Powder Metallurgy Progress, Vol. 4 (2005), p.204.

Google Scholar

[3] J.R. Moon, in: Deformation and fracture of structural PM materials, edited by L. Parilak.

Google Scholar

[4] H. Danninger, Slovak Academy of Sciences in Kosice, Vol 1 (2002), p.13.

Google Scholar

[5] R.A. Phillips, J.E. King and J.R. Moon, Powder Metallurgy, Vol. 43 (2000), p.43.

Google Scholar

[6] R.A. Phillips, J.E. King and J.R. Moon, Powder Metallurgy, Vol. 43 (2000), p.149.

Google Scholar

[5] [10] [15] [20] 0 10 20 30 40 50 Crack extension energy, G/kJm -2 C = 0. 2% C= 0. 5 or 0. 6% Fatigue crack growth exponent, m.

Google Scholar

[5] [10] [15] [20] 0 50 100 150 200 Strain energy density to fracture/MJm -3 C = 0. 2% C = 0. 5 or 0. 6% Fatigue crack growth exponent, m.

Google Scholar

[5] [10] [15] [20] 0 10 20 30 Elongation to fracture/% C = 0. 2% C = 0. 5 or 0. 6% Fatigue crack growth exponent, m.

Google Scholar

[5] [10] [15] [20] 0 20 40 60 80 100 C = 0. 2% C = 0. 5 or 0. 6% Fatigue crack growth exponent, m KQ/MPa√m.

Google Scholar