Seismic Performance Evaluation for Steel Reinforced Concrete Frame Structures

Qiu Wei Wang; Qing Xuan Shi; Liu Jiu Tang

doi:10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.255-260.2421

Paper Titles

Typical Seismic Damage Analysis and Repair Reinforcement Methods Study of Reinforced Concrete Industrial Buildings
p.2399

Study on Reconstruction Program of Cereals Infrastructure after the Wenchuan Earthquake - with the City of Mianyang for Example
p.2404

Comparison between Supporting Structure Programs in Deep Foundation of Zhengzhou Exhibition Hotel and Analysis on Monitoring Results
p.2409

Seismic Behaviour Experimental Study of the D-Type Energy Dissipating Eccentrically Brace
p.2414

Seismic Performance Evaluation for Steel Reinforced Concrete Frame Structures
p.2421

Performance-Based Pushover Analysis for Reinforced Concrete Frame
p.2426

Experimental Study on Direct Performance-Based Behaviour of High-Performance Concrete Shear Walls
p.2434

Experimental Investigation on Seismic Behaviors of High-Performance Concrete Shear Walls of Rectangular Section
p.2439

Experimental Study of Uniaxial Tensile of High Performance Ductile Engineered Cementitious Composites
p.2444

HomeAdvanced Materials ResearchAdvanced Materials Research Vols. 255-260Seismic Performance Evaluation for Steel...

Seismic Performance Evaluation for Steel Reinforced Concrete Frame Structures

Abstract:

The randomness and uncertainty of seismic demand and structural capacity are considered in demand-capacity factor method (DCFM) which could give confidence level of different performance objectives. Evaluation steps of investigating seismic performance of steel reinforced concrete structures with DCFM are put forward, and factors in calculation formula are modified based on stress characteristics of SRC structures. A regular steel reinforced concrete frame structure is analyzed and the reliability level satisfying four seismic fortification targets are calculated. The evaluation results of static and dynamic nonlinear analysis are compared which indicates that the SRC frame has better seismic performance and incremental dynamic analysis could reflect more dynamic characteristics of structures than pushover method.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Advances in Civil Engineering, CEBM 2011

View Preview

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 255-260)

Pages:

2421-2425

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.255-260.2421

Citation:

Cite this paper

Online since:

May 2011

Authors:

Qiu Wei Wang, Qing Xuan Shi, Liu Jiu Tang

Keywords:

Demand-Capacity-Factor Method, Incremental Dynamic Analysis, Pushover Analysis, Seismic Performance Evaluation, Steel Reinforced Concrete Frames

Export:

RIS, BibTeX

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Request Permissions

Permissions PLS:

Request Permissions

Сopyright:

Citation:

References

[1] S. Y. Yun, R. O. Hamburger and C. A. Cornell: ASCE, Jour. of Struc. Engrg. Vol. 141-1 (2002), p.95

Google Scholar

[2] FEMA. Recommended seismic evaluation and upgrade criteria for existing welded steel moment-frame Buildings. Report No. FEMA-351, Emergency Management Agency, Washington, D.C., (2000)

Google Scholar

[3] V. V. Bertero: Strength and deformation capacities of buildings under extreme environments. Structural Engineering and Structural Mechanics. pp.29-79 (1977)

Google Scholar

[4] N. Luco, C. A. Cornell: ASCE, Jour. of Struc. Engrg. Vol. 126-1 (2000), p.127

Google Scholar