Studies on the Effects of the Potential Sweep Rates and pH on the Corrosion Rate of Polyaniline Coated Steel

Article Preview

Abstract:

Polyaniline (PAni) film was successfully electrodeposited on the surface of steel substrates in oxalic acid electrolyte by cyclic voltammetry at different potential sweep rates (dE/dt) (10, 20 and 30 mVs-1) and different pH values (1.55, 2.55 and 3.55). The coated steel with PAni was characterized by Field Emission Scanning Electron Microscopy (FESEM) and Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy (FTIR) techniques. The corrosion resistance of the electrodeposited layers was evaluated by potentiodynamic polarization in 0.1 M NaCl aqueous solution. The results showed that with increasing pH and sweep rate the amount of corrosion rate decreased and increased respectively. Moreover, the correlation between variation of anodic charge (Qa) with pH and sweep rate has been evaluated. The variation of anodic charge confirmed that the growing rate of polymer decreased with increasing sweep rate and pH. The result of potentiodynamic polarization showed that the coated steel with synthesized PAni in pH 3.5 and sweep rate 0.01Vs-1 had better protective properties against corrosion.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 264-265)

Pages:

463-468

Citation:

Online since:

June 2011

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2011 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] P. Zarras, N. Anderson, C. Webber, D. J. Irvin, J. A., Irvin, A. Guenthner and J. D. Stenger-Smith: . Radi. Phys. Chem. Vol. 68 (2003), p.387.

DOI: 10.1016/s0969-806x(03)00189-0

Google Scholar

[2] R. Ansari and Amir H. Alikhani: J. coat. Technol. Res., Vol. 6(2) (2009), p.221.

Google Scholar

[3] S. Sathiyanarayanan, S. Syed Azim and G. Venkatachari: Prog. Org. Coat., Vol. 65(2009), p.152.

Google Scholar

[4] Solange de Souza: J. metals. surf. Coat. Tech., Vol. 201(2007), p.7574.

Google Scholar

[5] D. W. Deberry: J. Electrochem. Soc., Vol. 132(1985), p.1022.

Google Scholar

[6] T. Lindfors and A. Ivaska: J. Electroanal. Chem., Vol. 531(2002), p.43.

Google Scholar

[7] J. Stejskal, J. Prokeš and M. Trchová: React. Funct. Polym, Vol. 68(2008), p.1355.

Google Scholar

[8] Michale S. Freund and Bhavana Deore, in: Self-doped conducting Polymers, John Wiley and Sons Lth, West Sussex PO19 8SQ, England, (2007).

Google Scholar

[9] M. Kraljić Roković, B. Perši and Z. Mandić: J. Electroanal. Chem. Vol. 643 (2010), p.46.

Google Scholar

[10] D. Sazou and C. Georglios: J. Electranal. Chem., Vol. 429(1997), p.87.

Google Scholar

[11] S. Sadki : Chem. Soc. Rev., Vol. 29(2000), p.283.

Google Scholar

[12] A. S. Bard, in: Electrochemical Methods Fundamentals and Application, John Wiley and Sons Ind, 2nd ed, New York, (2000).

Google Scholar

[13] Nichlas M. Martyak: Mater. Chem. Phy., Vol. 81(2003), p.143.

Google Scholar

[14] X. -Y. Peng, F. Luan, X. -X. Liu, D. Diamond and K. -T. Lau,: Electrochimica Acta, Vol . 54 (2009), p.6172.

Google Scholar

[15] B. Wessling: Adv. Mater., Vol. 6(1994), p.226.

Google Scholar