Minimum Incremental k-Coverage in Ad-Hoc Sensor Network

Article Preview

Abstract:

The deployment is one of the stage while creating a wireless sensor network. A deployment may not reach some requirements for sustained and reliable operations, even though some redundant sensors are deployed. Improving the deployment by adding some sensors is an efficient way, which is treated as the incremental deployment problem. A problem named Minimum Incremental k-Coverage in a two-dimensional continuous space is formulated. Some definitions and theorems of coverage and adding target positions are derived. A heuristic approach to this problem is proposed and its performance is evaluated through extensive simulation-based experiments.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 271-273)

Pages:

377-382

Citation:

Online since:

July 2011

Authors:

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2011 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] A. Howard, M.J. Mataric, and G.S. Sukhatme. An incremental self-deployment algorithm for mobile sensor networks. Autonomous Robots, Special Issue on Intelligent Embedded Systems, 9 (2002).

DOI: 10.1109/irds.2002.1041702

Google Scholar

[2] Guiling Wang, Student Member, Guohong Cao, and Thomas F. La Porta. Movement-assisted sensor deployment. In Proceedings of INFOCOM, pages 2469–2479, 3 (2004).

DOI: 10.1109/infcom.2004.1354668

Google Scholar

[3] Yi Zou and Krishnendu Chakrabarty. Sensor deployment and target localization based on virtual forces. In Proceedings of INFOCOM, (2003).

DOI: 10.1109/infcom.2003.1208965

Google Scholar

[4] Guiling Wang, Guohong Cao, Tom La Porta, and Wensheng Zhang. Sensor relocation in mobile sensor networks. In Proc. of IEEE INFOCOM, pages 2302–2312, (2005).

DOI: 10.1109/infcom.2005.1498517

Google Scholar

[5] H. Gupta, S. R. Das, and Q. Gu. Connected sensor cover: selforganization of sensor networks for efficient query execution. In Proc. of the ACM MobiHoc, pages 189–200, (2003).

DOI: 10.1145/778415.778438

Google Scholar

[6] Z. Zhou, S. Das, and H. Gupta. Connected k-coverage problem in sensor networks. In Proc. of Int. Conf. on Computer Communications and Networks, pages 373–378, (2004).

Google Scholar

[7] M. Hefeeda. Randomized k-coverage algorithms for dense sensor networks. In Proc. of INFOCOM Minisymp., pages 2376–2380, (2007).

Google Scholar

[8] S. Yang, F. Dai, M. Cardei, J. Wu, and F. Patterson. On connected multiple point coverage in wireless sensor networks. Int. J. of Wireless Info. Networks, 13(4): 289–301, (2006).

DOI: 10.1007/s10776-006-0036-z

Google Scholar

[9] A. Savvides, C. Han, and M. Strivastava. Dynamic finegrained localization in ad-hoc networks of sensors. In Proc. of ACM MOBICOM, pages 166–179, (2001).

Google Scholar

[10] J. C. Culberson and R. A. Reckhow. Covering polygons is hard. In Foundations of Computer Science, 1988., 29th Annual Symposium on, pages 601–611, 10 (1988).

DOI: 10.1109/sfcs.1988.21976

Google Scholar

[11] D. Lee. On k-nearest neighbor voronoi diagrams in the plane. IEEE Transactions on Computers, 31(6), 6 (1982).

Google Scholar

[12] Alok Aggarwal1, Leonidas J. Guibas, James Saxe, and Peter W. Shor. A linear-time algorithm for computing the voronoi diagram of a convex polygon. Discrete and Computational Geometry, 4(1), 12 (1989).

DOI: 10.1007/bf02187749

Google Scholar