How Does Equity Structure Impact M&A Decision? a Model Based on Private Benefits

Article Preview

Abstract:

This paper focus on the private benefit of large shareholder’s control right within the framework of Agency Theory 2 and construct a model which can illustrate how M&A decision can be impacted by acquirer’s equity structure. The model internalizes large shareholder’s private benefit as a function of the shareholding ratio and specifies the mechanism through which large shareholder’s shareholding ratio and ownership concentration impact the M&A decision. This paper provides theoretical foundation for those empirical literatures which analyze the M&As from the perspective of Agency Theory 2.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 271-273)

Pages:

742-747

Citation:

Online since:

July 2011

Authors:

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2011 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., and Shleifer, A., Corporate Ownership around the World[J]. Journal of Finance, 1999. 54: 471-518.

DOI: 10.1111/0022-1082.00115

Google Scholar

[2] Faccio, Mara, and Larry Lang. The ultimate ownership of Western European Companies[J] Journal of Financial Economics, 2002, 65: 365-395.

DOI: 10.1016/s0304-405x(02)00146-0

Google Scholar

[3] Johson S, La Porta R, Lopez-de-Silanes F, and Shleifer A. Tunneling [J]. American Economic Review, 2000, 90(2): 22-27.

DOI: 10.1257/aer.90.2.22

Google Scholar

[4] Ben-Amar, W. and P. André. Separation of Ownership and Control and Acquiring Firm Performance: The Case of Family Ownership in Canada [J], Journal of Business Finance and Accounting, 2006, 33 (3) & (4): 517-543.

DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-5957.2006.00613.x

Google Scholar

[5] Holmen, M. and J.D. Knopf, Minority Shareholder Protections and the Private Benefits of Control for Swedish Firms[J], Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 2004, 39: 167-191.

DOI: 10.1017/s0022109000003938

Google Scholar

[6] Bae, K.H., J.K. Kang. and J.M. Kim, Tunnelling or Value Addition? Evidence from Mergers by Korean Business Groups [J], Journal of Finance, 2002, 57: 2695-2740.

DOI: 10.1111/1540-6261.00510

Google Scholar

[7] Huang Xingluan and Shen Weitao, Propping or Pulling out Empirical Analysis from Related Acquisitions of Chinese listed Companies [J], Economics Mnagement Journal, 2006, 12: 57-64. ( In Chinese).

Google Scholar

[8] Li Zengquan, Yu Qian and Wang Xiaokun, Tunneling, Propping and M&A: Evidence from Chinese Listed Companies [J], Economics Research Journal, 2005, 1: 95-105. ( In Chinese).

Google Scholar

[9] Bhaumik, Sumon K. and Selarka, Ekta , Impact of M&A on Firm Performance in India: Implications for Concentration of Ownership and Insider Entrenchment[R], William Davidson Institute Working Paper No. 907. Available at SSRN: http: /ssrn. com/abstract=970001, (2008).

DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.970001

Google Scholar

[10] Bigelli, M. and S. Mengoli, Sub-Optimal Acquisition Decision under a Majority Shareholder System[J], Journal of Management and Governance, 2004, 8: 373-405.

DOI: 10.1007/s10997-004-4896-2

Google Scholar

[11] Jung Wook Shim and Hiroyuki Okamuro, Mergers by Family and Non-family Firms in Japan, 1955-1973: Does Ownership Matter?[R] Available at: http: /hermes-ir. lib. hit-u. ac. jp/rs/handle/10086/16225, (2008).

Google Scholar

[12] Zhu Dongqin and Chen Wenhao, Effects of Control Right and the Deviation between Control Right and Cash Flow Right on Acquisitions: Evidence from Private Listed Companies in China [J], Journal of Economics and Finance, 2010, 2: 121-131. ( In Chinese).

DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-37270-4_64

Google Scholar

[13] Shleifer, Andrei, and Robert W. Vishny, Large Shareholders and Corporate Control[J], Journal of Political Economy , 1986. 94: 461-88.

DOI: 10.1086/261385

Google Scholar

[14] La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., Shleifer, A., and R. Vishny,. Investor Protection and Corporate Valuation [J]. Journal of Finance, 2002. 57(3): 1197-1170.

DOI: 10.1111/1540-6261.00457

Google Scholar

[15] Wu Hongjun and Wu Shinong, Theoretical Analysis and Empirical Test to Check-and-balance Ownership Structure, Tunneling and Corporate value [J], Economics Mnagement Journal, 2 009, 3: 44-52. ( In Chinese).

Google Scholar

[16] Gorton, Gary B., Kahl, Matthias and Rosen, Richard J, \Eat or Be Eaten: A Theory of Mergers and Merger Waves [J], Journal of Finance, 2009, 64: 1291-1340.

DOI: 10.3386/w11364

Google Scholar

[17] Ma Xiaojun and Shen Qiongye, Private Benefit, Agency and M&A: An Analysis on Vote Right as well as Control Right Doscount [J], Nankai Economic Studies , 2004, 3: 87-92. ( In Chinese).

Google Scholar

[18] Muthoo, Abhinay (1999), Bargaining Theory with Applications[M], Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.

Google Scholar

[19] Shi Xiancheng, A Positive Analysis of Ownership Structure and Merger Conduction Preference [J], The Study of Finance and Economics, 2004, 6: 134-144. ( In Chinese).

Google Scholar

[20] Chen Jian and Xi Youmin, The Relationship of Group Affiliation, Concentration of Corporate Control and M&A with Related Party in Listed Companies [J], System Engineering, 2008, 1: 8-14(In Chinese).

Google Scholar

[21] Chen Jian , Xi Youmin and Jia Jun, Study on the Relationship of Corporate Control Balance and M&A with Related Party of Chinese Listed Companies [J], Management Review, 2009, 5: 3-12. ( In Chinese).

Google Scholar

[22] Jing Chi, Qian Sun, Martin R. Young Performance and Characteristics of Acquiring Firms in the Chinese Stock Markets[R]. CFRN working paper, Available at CFRN: http: /www. cfrn. com. cn/getPaper. do?id=1796, (2009).

Google Scholar

[23] Song, Saw-Imm, Ali, Ruhani and Pillay, Subramaniam, Corporate Takeovers in in Malaysia: The Determinants of Post-Acquistion Values of Acquiring Firms[R], Available at SSRN: http: /ssrn. com/abstract=1031609, (2007).

DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.1031609

Google Scholar