Optimization of Laser Transmission Joining Process between Different Thermoplastics using Response Surface Methodology

Article Preview

Abstract:

In order to determine the optimum joint conditions, four key process parameters affecting the joint quality of laser transmission joint of 1mm thick PET film and PC film,namely,laser power, scanning speed, clamping pressure and scanning number are optimized by response surface methodology in this paper. The interaction effect of main process parameters on joint quality is researched. The samples are tested using a multi-axis microtester in order to determine joint strength. The morphology of the joining area is observed with an optical microscope. Design Expert analysis indicates that the best laser power, scanning speed, clamping pressure and scanning number on joint quality were 35.7W, 5.0mm/s, 0.75MPa, 3, respectively. Finally, the experimental results are consistent with the predicted, which illustrates that the developed mathematical models can predict the responses adequately.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 291-294)

Pages:

1433-1439

Citation:

Online since:

July 2011

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2011 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Sultana Taslema, Wayne State University Dissertation(2007).

Google Scholar

[2] Pin Li, Jiangsu University Dissertation(2010 in Chinese )

Google Scholar

[3] S . MIYOSHI, T. IFUKUBE and J . MATSUSHIMA, Transactions of the Institute of Electrical Engineers of Japan Part A 118-A(3) (1998), 260.

Google Scholar

[4] Song, Xinhua Wang, Xiao; Li, Pin; Xu, Zhenkai, Wang, Kai, Liu, Huixia: Journal of Materials Processing TechnologyVol. 154-155(2011), pp.1119-1124.

Google Scholar

[5] E.M. Anawa, A.G Olabi: Journal of Materials Processing Technology Vol. 204(22008),pp.22-33

Google Scholar

[6] I. Bauer, U.A. Russek, H. J. Herfurth, R. Witte, et al:SPIE ,Vol. 5339(2004)

Google Scholar

[7] Mian.A , Newaz.G , Vendra.L, et al:Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine Vol. 16(2005), p.229

Google Scholar

[8] Xiao Wang,Pin Li,Zhenkai Xu, et al: Journal of Materials Processing Technology,Vol. 210 (2010) ,p.1767–1771

Google Scholar

[9] Zhenkai Xu, Huixia Liu, Pin Li Xinhua Song, Kai Wang,Xiao Wang: Journal of Materials Science and Engineering Applications Vol. 160-162(2011 ), pp.1118-1125.

Google Scholar

[10] Bappa Acherjee, Dipten MIsra, DIpankar Bose, K. V.enkadeshwaran: Journal of Optics & Laser Technology Vol. 41(2009), pp.956-967

Google Scholar

[11] G. Zak, L. Mayboudi, M. Chen, P.J. Bates, M.Birk : Journal of Materials Processing Technology Vol. 210(2010), pp.24-31

Google Scholar

[12] Coelho JMP, Abreu MA, Pires MC: Journal of Optics and Lasers in Engineering Vol. 34(2000), pp.385-395

Google Scholar

[13] K.Y. Benyounis, A.G. Olabi, M.S.J. Hashmi: Journal of Materials Processing Technology Vol. 164-965(2005), pp.986-989

Google Scholar