The Finite Element Model (FEM) Updating of Mirror Frame System Based on Response Surface Method

Article Preview

Abstract:

It is difficult in finite element model(FEM) updating, because the essence is a mechanical anti-question solving. In the paper, the suppositional material method is utilized to model the FEM of a mirror frame system, and the required updating parameters are defined. The functions between the natural frequency and the updating parameters are established based on the response surface method. Based on the response surface model and the modal experiment results, the sum of absolute value of relative errors between the results of experiments and simulations is defined as the optimization objective, four required updating are identified automatically. The first three natural frequencies of updated mirror frame system are better accordant with the experiment results, which proves the method correct and reliable.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 291-294)

Pages:

1615-1620

Citation:

Online since:

July 2011

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2011 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Baruch M. Optimization Procedure to Correct Stiffness and Flexibility Matrices Using Vibration Test[J]. AIAA Journal, 1978, 16(1):1208-1210

DOI: 10.2514/3.61032

Google Scholar

[2] Qinghua Zeng. A Finite Element Model Updating Method With Design Parameters[J]. Acta Aeronautica Et Astronautica Sinica(In Chinese), 1992, 13(1):29-35

Google Scholar

[3] Mottershead J E, Friswell M I. Model updating in structural dynamics: a survey[J]. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 1993, 167:347-375

DOI: 10.1006/jsvi.1993.1340

Google Scholar

[4] Berman A, etc. Improvement of Analytical Model Using Ground Vibration Test Data[J]. AIAA Journal, 1983, 21(8):1168-1173

Google Scholar

[5] Ojalvo I U, etc. Practical suggestions for modifying mathmodels to correlation with actical modal test results[A]. In:Proceedings of 7th IMAC, Lasvegas,1989:347-354.

Google Scholar

[6] Wei Tim J C, etc. Correction of FEM Via selected physical parameters[A]. In: proceedings of 7th IMAC, Lasvegas,1989:1231-1238.

Google Scholar

[7] Lingmi Zhang. Dynamic Finite Element Model Updating And Its Application in Aerospace Structures[J]. Structure & Environment Engineering(In Chinese), 1994, 2:10-17

Google Scholar

[8] Yigui Xu, Yichen Zhou, Zhihua Wang. Updating of Dynamic Model Suspension Bridge Using Adaptive Neural Network Method[J]. Journal of Vibration Engineering(In Chinese), 2000, 13(1):46-52

Google Scholar

[9] Xingde Zhou, Baohua Ming, Ruihong Pan, etc. Research on Modification of Model Reduction Based on Genetic Algorithms[J]. Journal of Vibration, Measurement & Diagnosis(In Chinese), 2007, 27(1):25-28

Google Scholar

[10] Rutherford, A.C., Inman, D.J., Park, G., etc. Use of response surface metamodels for identification of stiffness and damping coefficients in a simple dynamic system[J]. Shock and Vibration, 2005, 12(5):317-331

DOI: 10.1155/2005/484283

Google Scholar

[11] Qiang LI, Yunjian GUO, Penghui LI, etc. A Sensitivity Analysis Calculation Method of Gun Barrel Design Parameter Based on Response Surface Method[J],Journal of Gun Launch & Control(In Chinese), 2010, 3(1):56-59

Google Scholar

[12] Qingguo Fei, Xiaolin Han, Heling Su. Response Surface Based Finite Element Model Updating and Its Application[J]. Journal of Vibration, Measurement & Diagnosis(In Chinese), 2010, 30(2):132-135

Google Scholar