Study of the Multiaxial Fatigue Life Influencing Factors Based on the Critical Plane Approach

Article Preview

Abstract:

The tension-torsion thin walled tube specimens were used as the researching object in this paper. The method of determination to the critical plane which has the maximum normal strain and maximum shear strain was expounded. The strain state on the critical plane under non-proportional loading was analyzed, and the unified prediction model was used to calculate the fatigue life. In order to research the influence of phase difference on fatigue life under the non-proportional loading, the relation of the equivalent strain and the phase difference in different positive strain amplitude and different strain amplitude ratio were analyzed. It’s found that the dangerous phase difference which has the shortest fatigue life is in direct relation with the strain amplitude ratio. The general formula of dangerous phase difference is presented. Through the material mechanics performance and fatigue parameters of uniaxial stress state, the coefficients in the formula can be obtained and the coefficients of 15 kinds of common materials are given for practical application.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 295-297)

Pages:

2314-2320

Citation:

Online since:

July 2011

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2011 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Deguang Shang, Dejun Wang: Multiaxial fatigue strength. Beijing:Science publisher, pp.82-87&93-100, (2007).(In Chinese)

Google Scholar

[2] Kim K S, Park J C.: Int. J. Fatigue. Vol. 21(1999), pp.475-483.

Google Scholar

[3] Wang C H, Brown M W. J.: Eng. Mater. Tech. Vol. 118(1996), pp.367-374.

Google Scholar

[4] Fatemi A, Socie D F.: Fatigue Fract Engng Mater Struct. Vol. 11(1988), pp.149-165.

Google Scholar

[5] Glinka G, Shen G, Plumtree A: Fatigue Fract Engng Mater Struct. Vol. 18(1995), pp.37-64.

Google Scholar

[6] Lagoda T, Macha E, Bedkowski W : Int. J. Fatigue. Vol. 21(1999), pp.431-443.

Google Scholar

[7] Varvani-Farahani A : Int. J. Fatigue. Vol. 22(2000), pp.295-306.

Google Scholar

[8] Brown M W, Miller K J: Proc Inst Mechanical Engineering. Vol. 187(1973), pp.745-755.

Google Scholar

[9] Fatemi A, Socie D F :Fatigue Engng Mater Struct. Vol. 14(1988), pp.149-165

Google Scholar

[10] Deguang Shang, Weixing Yao, Dejun Wang, Hao Xu: Acta Mechanica Solida Sinica. Vol. 20(1999), pp.201-210. (In Chinese)

Google Scholar

[11] Chu C C: Fatigue damage calculation using the critical plane approach. J Engng Mater Tech, ASME, J Engng Meter Tech.Vol. 117(1995), pp.41-49.

Google Scholar

[12] Lei Wang, Dejun Wang: Journal of Mechanical Strength. 25(2003), pp.204-206. (In Chinese)

Google Scholar

[13] Lei Wang, De-Jun Wang: Journal of Northeastern University (Natural Science). Vol. 23(2002), pp.174-177. (In Chinese)

Google Scholar

[14] Banghua Zhao, Pengmin Lv, Mingfu Wang, Guangpu Meng: Journal of Lanzhou Railway Institute. Vol. 12(1993), pp.24-32, (In Chinese)

Google Scholar

[15] Deguang Shang, Guoqin Sun, Jing Deng, Chuliang Yan: International Journal of Fatigue.Vol. 29(2007):2200-2207. (In Chinese)

Google Scholar

[16] Dan Jin: PhD thesis of Tianjin University. (2004). (In Chinese)

Google Scholar

[17] Yingyu Wang: PhD thesis of Nanjing university of Aeronautics and Astronautics. (2005). (In Chinese)

Google Scholar

[18] Jing Li, Qiang Sun, Chunwang Li, Yan-Jiang Qiao, Zhong-Ping Zhang: Journal of Mechanical Engineering. Vol. 45(2009), pp.285-289. (In Chinese)

Google Scholar

[19] Sun, G.. Q., Shang, D. G., Ding, L., Jia, G. H.,and Wang R. J.: Journal of Beijing University of Technology. Vol. 32(2006), pp.668-692.

Google Scholar

[20] Luca Susmel, Giovanni Meneghetti, Bruno Atzori: Journal of Engineering Materials and Technology. Vol. 131(2009), pp.1-9.

Google Scholar

[21] Atzori, B.,Berto, F., Lazzarin, P., and Quaresimin, M.: Int. J. Fatigue.Vol. 28(2006), pp.485-493.

Google Scholar