Multiple Objective Preform Die Shape Optimization Design for Controlling Forging’s Shape and Deforming Force during Forging Process

Article Preview

Abstract:

In order to decrease the cost of the material and energy during the forging process, multiple preform die shape optimization design was carried out in this paper. Based on the FEM, a sensitivity analysis method was used to perform the optimization procedure. The shape of the forging and deforming force of the final forging was used to express the cost of material and energy respectively. Using the weighted sum method, the total objective function was gotton. The coordinates of the control point of the B-spline used to represent the preform die shape was determined as the optimization design variable. The sensitivity equations of the total objective function with respect to the design variables was developed. The multiple objective perform design optimization software was developed by FORTRAN language. And then, the preform die shape of an H-shaped forging process is optimized. The total objective function, sub-objective function, the shape of the preform die and the final forging during the optimization were given. After the optimiztion, a near net shape forging was obtained. At the same time, the deforming force decreased. The optimization results are very satisfactory.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 306-307)

Pages:

1504-1507

Citation:

Online since:

August 2011

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2011 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] S. Badrinarayanan and N. Zabara: Computer Methods. Appl. Mech. Eng. Vol. 129(1996), p.319.

Google Scholar

[2] L. Fourment, J.L. Cheno: Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng. Vol. 39 (1996), p.33.

Google Scholar

[3] L. Fourment, J.L. Cheno: Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng. Vol. 39 (1996), p.51.

Google Scholar

[4] G.Q. Zhao, Ed. Wright, R. V. Grandh: Int. Mach. Tools Manufact.Vol.37.(1997),p.1251.

Google Scholar

[5] G.Q. Zhao, Ed. Wright, R. V. Grandhi: Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng.Vol.40.(1997), p.1213.

Google Scholar

[6] X.H. Zhao, G.Q. Zhao, G.C. Wang, T.H. Wang: J. Mater. Sci. Technol.Vol.18.(2002) p.465.

Google Scholar

[7] X.H. Zhao, G.Q. Zhao, G.C. Wang, T.H. Wang: J. Mater. Sci. Technol. Vol.22.(2002), p.273.

Google Scholar

[8] X.H. Zhao, J.F. Li, X. H. Huang and G.Q. Zhao: J, Mech. Eng. Vol.45 (2009), p.193.

Google Scholar

[9] Z.Y. Gao and R.V. Grandh: Int. J. Numer. Meth. Eng.. Vol.45 (1999), p.1249.

Google Scholar

[10] Z.Y. Gao and R. V. Grandhi: Int. J. Mach. Tool. Manufact, Vol. 40(2000), p.691.

Google Scholar

[11] C.F. Castro, C.A.C. Antonio and L.C. Sousa: J. Mater. Proc. Technol. Vol. 146 (2004), p.356.

Google Scholar

[12] I. Doltsinis and T. Rodic: Int. J. Numer. Meth. Eng. Vol.45 (1999), p.661.

Google Scholar

[13] R.P. Luo, H. Yao, Y.H. Peng and Y.Q. Zhang: Forg. Stamp. Technol. Vol. 25 (2000), p.52.

Google Scholar

[14] J. Guan, G.C. Wang, T. Guo, L.B. Song, and G.Q. Zhao: Mater. Sci. Eng. Vol. 499 (2009), p.304.

Google Scholar

[15] G.C. Wang, J. Guan, T. Guo and G.Q. Zhao: J. Plasticity Eng. Vol. 15 (2008), p.61.

Google Scholar

[16] Y.H. Yang, D. Liu, Z.Y. He and Z.J. Lu: Chin. J. Aeronaut. Vol. 23 (2010), p.260.

Google Scholar