A Kind of Improved GQM Measurement Model for Software Process

Article Preview

Abstract:

Software quality measurement is closely connected with process and product. With measurement and analysis on software process data, improvement and control on software can be achieved. Effective process performance model plays key role in understanding and controlling. Introduction of GQM model into software measurement process can achieve controllability and testability of software process. GQM uses organization target as measurement index to achieve measurement of software process quantitative. The core idea of CMM/CMMI is to build fact-based management and CMM/CMMI software process management is built on the basis of software measurement. Combining with CMM/CMMI measurement idea, GQM model was expanded to achieve a kind of improved process performance model.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 341-342)

Pages:

550-554

Citation:

Online since:

September 2011

Keywords:

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2012 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Dan Xu, Jin-gui Huang and Qiao Wei: Goal based software process performance assessment model, Computer Engineering and Applications, Vol. 44, 2008, pp.54-56.

Google Scholar

[2] Ya-hong Li, Ke-gang Hao and Wei Ge: Software project progress measurement process based on GQM model, Computer Applications. Vol. 25, 2005, pp.1448-1450.

Google Scholar

[3] Briand L. C., Differding C. M. and Rombach H. D.: Practical guidelines for measurement-based process improvement, Software Process Improvement and Practice Journal, Vol. 2, 1997, pp.231-238.

DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1099-1670(199612)2:4<253::aid-spip53>3.0.co;2-g

Google Scholar

[4] Card D. N.: What makes for effective measurement, IEEE Software. Vol. 10, 1993, pp.94-95.

Google Scholar

[5] Qing Wang and Ming-shu Li: Measurement of software requirement based on SPC, Chinese Journal of Computers. Vol. 26, 2003, pp.1312-1317.

Google Scholar