Study on Mercury Adsorption Performance of Modified Fly Ash

Article Preview

Abstract:

The fly ash was modified by Cl, Fe, Cu salts to investigate the mercury adsorption performance and analyze the impacts on it. Experiment results indicate that significant improvement of removal efficiencies with FeCl3、CuCl2 and CuBr2 impregnation onto fly ash. The modification adjusted the pore structure of fly ash and formed more pores to absorb Hg, also it was found that new active sites were generated after the treatment, which can oxidize Hg0 and improve chemical adsorption.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 343-344)

Pages:

246-249

Citation:

Online since:

September 2011

Keywords:

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2012 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Galbreath K C, Zygarlicke C J. Mercury transformation in coal combustion flue gas. Fuel Processing Technology, 2000, 65: 289-310.

DOI: 10.1016/s0378-3820(99)00102-2

Google Scholar

[2] Bake J I, Eum H M. Sorbent for removal form combustion flue gas, contains activated heavy oil fly ash impregnated with preset amount of sulfur, iodine, bromine and/ or chlorine. Fuel, 2008, 86: 367-374.

Google Scholar

[3] Bake J I, Yoon J H, Lee S H, Chong K R. Removal of vapor-phase elemental mercury by oil-fired fly ashes. Industry and Engineering Chemistry Resource, 2007, 46: 1390-1395.

DOI: 10.1021/ie060813h

Google Scholar

[4] Sliger R N, Kramlich J C, Marinov N M. Towards the development of a chemical kinetic model for the homogeneous oxidation of mercury by chlorine species. Fuel Processing Technology, 2000, 65-66(1): 423-438.

DOI: 10.1016/s0378-3820(99)00108-3

Google Scholar

[5] SITU Jiesheng, WANG guangjian, ZHANG denggao. Chemical Products Guide. Beijign: Beijing industry press, (2004).

Google Scholar

[6] SONG Qingfeng, ZHANG Yongchun, ZHOU Jingxia. Removing hydrogen sulfide with activated carbon fibers modified ferric salts at ambient temperature. Modern Chemical Industry, 2007, 6: 272-276.

Google Scholar