Comparative Study of the Flux of Filamentous Bulking MBR and Non-Bulking MBR

Article Preview

Abstract:

Under the same operating mode, the flux of non-bulking MBR(1#) descends much faster than the flux of filamentous bulking MBR(3#), mainly because the particles adhered to membrane 1# become smaller much more quickly,provided that spherical particles tend to be rushed off into the mixed liquid more easily than filamentous particles. The falling of particles diameter is caused by the decline of flux, which can be interpreted with the formulation for critical diameter and flux as well as Critical Flux Theory.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 368-373)

Pages:

3809-3815

Citation:

Online since:

October 2011

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2012 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[2] Wang Hongcheng. The Operation, Control and Maintenance of Urban Sewage Treatment Plant. Beijing: Science Press, 1997.

Google Scholar

[3] Liu Hongxia, Wang Wenbiao, Du Jun, Tian Lumei, etal. Study On The Creating Of Low DO For Flat-Sheet Membrane Bioreactor. Technology of Water Treatment, Vol35, No.10 (2009), p.86–90.

Google Scholar

[4] E. S. Tarleton, R. J. Wakeman. Understanding of flux decline in crossfolw microfiltration. Part 1: Effect of particle and pore size. Chemical Engineering Research & Design, 1993.

Google Scholar

[5] G. Foley, D. M. Malone. Modeling the effects of particle polydispersity in crossflow filtration. J. membr. Sci., Vol99, No.1 (1995), p.77–88.

Google Scholar