Comprehensive Mathematical Evaluation on Risk of Debris Flow

Fang Wei Liao; Xiao Liu; Ping Liu

doi:10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.368-373.829

Paper Titles

Analysis of Base-Isolation Building System
p.807

Engineering Geological Characteristics of one High Cut Slope in Chongqing Wanzhou
p.814

Experimental Study on Stiffness of Dougong in Chinese Ancient Buildings
p.819

Study on the Optimum Moisture of Cement-Solidified Sea Silt Road Embankment Adding Phosphate Tailing
p.823

Comprehensive Mathematical Evaluation on Risk of Debris Flow
p.829

Experiments Study on Freezing Injury of Railway Subgrade Regulated Using Injecting Salt Method
p.834

Analysis on Load Bearing Capacity of Column with Different Diameters of Steel Tube under Horizontal Displacement
p.838

Seismic Damage Analysis of Factory Buildings in 2008 Wenchuan Earthquake
p.842

The Seismic Dynamic Response on the Steel Spatial Arch Truss with 60 m Span and 0.4 Rise-Span Ratio
p.850

HomeAdvanced Materials ResearchAdvanced Materials Research Vols. 368-373Comprehensive Mathematical Evaluation on Risk of...

Comprehensive Mathematical Evaluation on Risk of Debris Flow

Abstract:

Debris flow is one of the usual mountain geological disasters, and it is significant to assess and forecast its risk degree. The paper bases on statistical analysis of influence factors of debris flow risk degree, establishing 15 indexes to accurately assess debris flow risk degree. Furthermore, the evaluation index system is constructed by using analytic hierarchy process. And after combining the linkages between indexes, calculating each weight, and amending repeatedly with examples, finally the comprehensive mathematical evaluation on risk of debris flow is set up.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Advances in Civil Engineering and Architecture Innovation

View Preview

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 368-373)

Pages:

829-833

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.368-373.829

Citation:

Cite this paper

Online since:

October 2011

Authors:

Fang Wei Liao, Xiao Liu, Ping Liu

Keywords:

Analysis Hierarchy Process (AHP), Debris Flow, Mathematical Quantification, Risk Degree

Export:

RIS, BibTeX

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Request Permissions

Permissions PLS:

Request Permissions

Сopyright:

Citation:

References

[1] Zu Lishengzhi, De Shan jiurenfu. The assessment of danger classes of debris flow [J]. 1977, 30(3): 7-16.

Google Scholar

[2] Hollingsworth R, Kovacs G S. Soil slumps and debris flows: prediction and protection [J]. Bulletin of the Association of Engineering Geologists, 1981, 38(1):17-28

DOI: 10.2113/gseegeosci.xviii.1.17

Google Scholar

[3] Liu Xilin.The research of debris flow risk determination [J].disaster, 1988, (03) ：10-15

Google Scholar

[4] Zhang chun-shan. Debris flow disaster risk assessment [J] Geological hazard and environmental protection.1995,6(03):33-40

Google Scholar

[5] Liu xilin. Debris flow risk and risk assessment of gully mud [J].Engineering geological journals.2002, 10(03): 266-273

Google Scholar

[6] The industry standard of geology and mineral resources of People's Republic of China, design standard of debris flow disaster prevention and control engineering (DZT0239-2004).(2004)

Google Scholar

[7] Xushubo. Principle of analytic hierarchy process (ahp) [M].Tianjin: Tianjin University press, 1988:145-165.

Google Scholar