Study on the Effects of Shear Strength and Aeration Method on Membrane Fouling in Vertical A/O-MBR Process

Article Preview

Abstract:

Vertical Anoxic/Oxic Membrane Bioreactor (A/O-MBR) was used to treat domestic sewage. PVDF hollow fiber membrane has been used in MBR. According to the comparison of intercommunity between three non-Newtonian fluid models (Bingham model, Ostwald model and Herschel-Bulkley model) and the test data, the Ostwald model was chose to describe the function relationship between shear intensity and aeration amount. In order to initiating a circulation velocity and to enhancing the scour to the MBR, the traditional aeration method was changed in this experiment. Two baffles were placed on both sides of the membrane modules, and aeration heads were scattered between two baffles. The influence of shear intensity and new aeration method to membrane fouling was investigated in this paper at shear intensity of 20s-1, 40s-1, 60s-1 and 80s-1. The result shows that the stronger shear intensity is, the heavier is the MBR been scoured and the smaller is the change of TMP. The best shear intensity was G=60s-1 after considering all factors comprehensively. Finally, the membrane modules were analyzed by scanning electron microscope (SEM). By the SEM pictures we can see that there are some spots on the membrane surface which deposited by fine grains, EPS and SMP. The spots have different size and location, large scale or compact contamination layer can not been found in the pictures. So it indicates that the changing of aeration method and the controlling of shear intensity has a positive impact on slowing down the membrane fouling.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 374-377)

Pages:

951-955

Citation:

Online since:

October 2011

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2012 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] R. Liu, X. Huang, C. Wang, L. Chen, Y. Qian, Study on hydraulic characteristics in a submerged membrane bioreactor process, Process Biochem. 2000, 36: 249-254.

DOI: 10.1016/s0032-9592(00)00210-7

Google Scholar

[2] J.Busch, A.Cruse, W.Marquardt, Modelling submerged hollow-fiber membrane filtration for wastewater treatment, J. Membr. Sci. 2007, 288: 94-111.9

DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2006.11.008

Google Scholar

[3] A. Pollice, C. Giordano, G. Laera, D. Saturno, G. Mininni, Physical characteristics of sludge in a complete retention membrane bioreactor, Water Res. 2007, 41: 1832-1840.

DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2007.01.022

Google Scholar

[4] S. Rosenberger, K. Kubin, M. Kraume, Rheology of activated sludge in membrane bioreactors, Eng. Life Sci. 2002, 2: 269-275.

DOI: 10.1002/1618-2863(20020910)2:9<269::aid-elsc269>3.0.co;2-v

Google Scholar

[5] G. Laera, C. Giordano, A. Pollice, D. Saturno, G. Mininni, Membrane bioreactor sludge rheology at different solid retention times,Water Res. 2007, 41: 4197-4203.

DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2007.05.032

Google Scholar

[6] T.R. Camp, P.C. Stein, Velocity gradient and internal work in fluid motion, J. Boston Soc. Civ. Eng. 1943, 30: 209.

Google Scholar

[7] S. Krause and P. Cornel, Untersuchungen zum Energiebedarf von Membranbelebungsreaktoren unter besonderer Berücksichtigung der Belüftungssysteme (Investigations of the energy demand of MBRs especially with regard to the aeration system),Tagungsband 6. Aachener Tagung: Membrantechnik in der Wasseraufbereitung und Abwasserbehandlung, A18, 2005.

Google Scholar

[8] P.R. Berube and E. Lei, The effect of hydrodynamic conditions and system configurations on the permeate flux in a submerged hollow fiber membrane system, J. Membr. Sci., 2006, 271, 29-37.

DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2006.01.048

Google Scholar

[9] T. Ueda, K. Hata, Y. Kikuoka and O. Seino, Effects of aeration on suction pressure in a submerged membrane bioreactor, Water Res., 1997, 55(3): 489-494.

DOI: 10.1016/s0043-1354(96)00292-8

Google Scholar

[10] L. Vera, S. Delgado and S. Elmaleh, Dimensionless number for the steady-state flux of cross-flow microfiltration and ultrafiltration with gas sparging, Chem. Eng. Sci., 2000, 55: 3419-3428.

DOI: 10.1016/s0009-2509(00)00016-6

Google Scholar