Enterprises Internal Management Investigation and Analysis

Abstract:

This thesis takes practical enterprise internal investigation of the consulting company for instance, thoroughly introducing the aim, content, method, analysis as well as report of this investigation. This investigation group conducted a thorough and systematic investigation to the internal management through the methods of desk research, materials consultation, on-the-spot investigation, anonymous questionnaire survey, post readme, in-depth interview, and visiting customers and the suppliers and displayed present situations and reform suggestions at aspects on company's strategic management, corporate culture, human resources management, production and quality management, sales management, financial management and management system.

• Periodical: Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 403-408)
• Pages: 1640-1643
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.403-408.1640
• Online since: November 2011
• Authors: Wen Ting Guo, Bing Liu, Yong Gui Liu
• Keywords: Enterprise Management, Internal Investigation, Investigation Method, Investigation Process

References

[1] Brace, I., 2008, Questionnaire design, Market Research in Practice, second edition.

[2] David S. Walonick, 1993, Everything You Wanted to Know about Questionnaires but were Afraid to Ask, Bloomington: StatPacInc.

DOI: 10.5040/9781472547675.ch-002

[3] Lisa A. Guion, 2006, Conducting an In-depth Interview, FCS6012, one of a series of the Family Youth and Community Sciences Department, Florida Cooperative Extension Service, Revised January 2006. Appendix Appendix A: Investigation Working Plan Aim of the Plan. In order to clarify the various stages of research work commissioned by the respective parties, and Consultant job content and objectives of the consultation exercise to achieve the desired goals, to set up the project. Research Arrangement. Entire company personnel were arranged to take the interview, the questionnaire survey, secret inquiries and so on, by using Statistical graph, SWOT analysis. Research Working Group. Advisory Group Members: 1 group leader, 2 relevant experts, 1 secretary. Task and Expected Research Plan. The investigation included five stages in total: I. Consultation Stage: 1. Negotiation and sign a contract; 2. The advisory group on-the-site exploration; 3. Communication with the top management; 4. Set investigation purpose and range. II. Preparation Stage: 1. Confirm the plan ; 2. Provide Related material list ; 3. Prepare and provide related material; 4. Device Interview Outline for the top, middle and primary level; 5. Devise Post Readme Form; 6. Device Questionnaire; 7. Program coordination and adjustment. III. Conduct Stage: 1. Mobilization; Questionnaire survey; 2. Post readme; 3. Interview top, middle management, primary level and operators one-on-one; 4. Communication with leadership. IV. Analysis Stage: 1. Collect and analyze the interview results; 2. Analyze the questionnaire; 3. Analysis of post readme; 4. Add access interview (if necessary); V. Suggestion and Report Stage: 1. Propose the scheme management reform suggestions; 2. Propose resources distribution plans; 3. Plan and write a detailed investigation report. Appendix B: Questionnaire Your Opinion I am Willing to Listen Dear Staff: In order to improve the management level of Simeier and build a pleasant working environment for you, we sincerely hope you can put forward real comments. With your active participation, we believe that the future of Simeier must be brighter! Task group will think highly of your advices, and summarize these comments to submit a management improvement plan. Here, we assure you that all of your comments are confidential to your colleagues and superiors.

[1] Very Disagree (VD), 2 Disagree (D), 3 Basically Agree (BA), 4 Agree (A), 5 Strongly Agree (SA) How do you agree with these staments VD D BA A SA 1) I like my present work.

DOI: 10.1787/9789264196261-graph58-en

[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] 2) I am satisfied with to the overall work of Simeier.

[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] 3) I understand company's strategy and target.

[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] 4) I have accepted systematic training from company.

[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] 5) Scientific and reasonable post request (or target).

[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] 6) Appraisal system in company is fair and perfect.

[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] 7) I think wages setting is fair.

[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] 8) Satisfied with my development and promotion in company.

[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] 9) There is a good relationship between leaders and employees.

[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] 10) Workers within my department coordinate very well.

[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] 11) Workers between departments can coordinate well.

[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] 12) Company development depends on leaders.

[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] 13) Company development depends on the talents.

[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] 14) Internal management should rely on the strict penalties.

[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] 15) Company development depends on marketing strategies.

[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] 16) Company development depends on product quality.

[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] 17) I have belonging for company.

[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] 18) Most employees work following regulations, not preference.

[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] 19) Simeier has its own formed corporate culture.

[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] 20) Company can encourage employees improve their ability.

[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] 21) Reward and punishment system is fair and reasonable.

[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] 22) Simeier has built a perfect promotion mechanism.

[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] 23) I do not agree with leaders' behavior.

[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] 24) Much overtime working and less leave is normal.

[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] 25) Confident in company's management revolution and future.

[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] Please answer the question briefly: 1) I think my company's strengths are: 2) I think my company's weaknesses are: 3) Three things you are satisfied most: 4) Three things you are dissatisfied most: 5) One issue I want to change most: Thanks for your cooperation.