Identification of Nolinear Systems Using Inceremnetal and Diffusion Differential Evolution Algorithms

Article Preview

Abstract:

The paper investigates on the use of Differential Evolution (DE) for training the system identification model particularly when the measurement data are available at different sensor nodes. Under such situation the conventional DE algorithms cannot be applied directly. Hence in this paper two distributed learning algorithms known as incremental DE (IDE) and diffusion DE (DDE) have been developed to meet the requirements. The identification of nonlinear plants under different noise conditions has been obtained through simulation study and the results have been compared with distributed PSO algorithms. The performance of the proposed algorithms in terms of convergence rate and minimum mean squared error indicate that the distributed DE algorithms exhibit superior performance compared to its PSO counter parts.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 403-408)

Pages:

3503-3509

Citation:

Online since:

November 2011

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2012 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] R. V. Kulkarni, A Forster and G. K. Venayagamoorthy, Computational Intelligence in Wireless Sensor Networks : A Survey, IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 2010. DOI 10. 1109/SURV. 2011. 040310. 00002.

DOI: 10.1109/surv.2011.040310.00002

Google Scholar

[2] N. Takahashi, I. Yamada and A. H. Sayed, Diffusion least-mean squares with adaptive combiners : Formulation and performance analysis, IEEE Trans. On Signal Processing, vol. 58, no. 9, pp.4795-4810, September (2010).

DOI: 10.1109/tsp.2010.2051429

Google Scholar

[3] C. G. Lopes and A. H. Sayed, Incremental adaptive strategies over distributed networks, IEEE Trans. On Signal Processing, vol. 55, no. 8, pp.4064-4077, August (2007).

DOI: 10.1109/tsp.2007.896034

Google Scholar

[4] B. Majhi, G. Panda and B. Mulgrew, Nonlinear identification over adaptive networks using distributed PSO algorithms, IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation (CEC 2009), Norway, 18-21 May 2009, p.2076-(2082).

DOI: 10.1109/cec.2009.4983197

Google Scholar

[5] M. A. Montes de Oca, T. Stutzle, K Van den Enden and M. Dorigo, Incremental social learning in particle swarms, IEEE Trans. On Systems, Man and Cybernetics – Part B: Cybernetics, 2010. DOI 10. 1109/TSMCB. 2010. 2055848.

DOI: 10.1109/tsmcb.2010.2055848

Google Scholar

[6] F. S. Cattivelli, C. G. Lopes and A. H. Sayed, Diffusion recursive least-squares for distributed estimation over adaptive networks, IEEE Trans. On Signal Processing, vol. 56, no. 5, pp.1865-1877, May (2008).

DOI: 10.1109/tsp.2007.913164

Google Scholar

[7] P. R. Wilson, J. N. Ross and A. D. Brown, Optimizing the Jiles Atherton model of hysteresis by a genetic algorithm, IEEE Trans. Magn., vol. 37, no. 2, pp.989-993, March (2001).

DOI: 10.1109/20.917182

Google Scholar

[8] M. Toman, G. Stumberger and D. Dolinar, Parameter identification of the Jiles-Atherton hysteresis model using differential evolution, IEEE Trans. On Magnetics, vol. 44, no. 6 pp.1098-1101, June (2008).

DOI: 10.1109/tmag.2007.915947

Google Scholar

[9] R. Storn and K. Price, Differential evolution-a simple and efficient adaptive scheme for global optimization over continuous spaces, Int. Comput. Sci. Inst. (ICSI), Berkeley, CA, tech. Rep. TR-95-012, March (1995).

Google Scholar

[10] R. Majhi, B. Majhi, M. K. Mishra and G. Panda, Retail sales forecasting using differential evolution, IEEE Int. Conference on Nature and Biologically Inspired Computig (NaBIC 09), Coimbatore, 9-11 Dec. 2009, pp.1343-1348.

DOI: 10.1109/nabic.2009.5393740

Google Scholar