Debonding Characterization of SMA/Polymer Morphing Structures

Article Preview

Abstract:

morphing structures are expected to play an increasingly important role in aeronautic applications, among others. Shape memory alloys (SMA) are one of the most promising candidates to date. However, work remains to be done before these structures meet the stringent requirements of their successful integration in an aeronautic context. Research has shown that SMA/Polymer interface strength can be a limiting factor in active deformable structure performance. In this study, the effect on the SMA/Polymer interface strength of various surface treatments, wire geometries and resin types are evaluated. SMA wire geometry is modified through a specific combination of cold rolling and post-deformation annealing, which is capable of maintaining SMA actuating properties while achieving required cross-section area reductions. The most promising thermomechanical processing is finally proposed but results show that further work is required before SMA active elements can safely be used in an active structure.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

621-626

Citation:

Online since:

November 2011

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2012 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] H.F. Parker: NACA Report, Vol. 77, (1920). p.41.

Google Scholar

[2] S. Barbarino, et al.: Journal of Intelligent Material Systems and Structures, Vol. 20, (2009). pp.283-96.

Google Scholar

[3] G.S. Bushnell, D. Arbogast, and R. Ruggeri: Shape control of a morphing structure (rotor blade) using a shape memory alloy actuator system (SPIE - The International Society for Optical Engineering 2008).

DOI: 10.1117/12.775927

Google Scholar

[4] A.K. Kancharla and D. Roy Mahapatra: Aerodynamic pressure variation over SMA wire integrated morphing aerofoil (American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics Inc. 2008).

DOI: 10.2514/6.2008-2044

Google Scholar

[5] G. Pritschow, W. Wadehn, and G. Kehl: Shape adaptation of fixed wing aircraft by shape memory alloys (MESSE BREMEN GMBH 2000).

Google Scholar

[6] D. Coutu, V. Brailovski, and P. Terriault: Journal of Aircraft, Vol. 46, (2009). pp.730-1.

Google Scholar

[7] H.A. Bruck, C.L. Moore, III, and T.M. Valentine: Proceedings of the Society for Experimental Mechanics, Inc, Vol. 51, (2004). pp.62-70.

Google Scholar

[8] P. Bettini, et al.: Journal of materials engineering and performance, Vol. 18, (2009). pp.664-671.

Google Scholar

[9] H.A. Bruck, C.L. Moore, and T.L. Valentine: Smart Materials and Structures, Vol. 11, (2002). pp.509-18.

Google Scholar

[10] K. Jonnalagadda, G.E. Kline, and N.R. Sottos: Exp. Mechanics, Vol. 37, (1997). pp.78-86.

Google Scholar

[11] C.L. Moore and H.A. Bruck: Smart Materials and Structures, Vol. 11, (2002). pp.130-139.

Google Scholar

[12] P. Chi-kin, L. Kin-tak, and Z. Li-min: Composites Part B, Vol. 36B, (2005). pp.25-31.

Google Scholar

[13] T. Georges, et al.: Journal of Mechanical Design, Transactions of the ASME, Vol. 131, (2009). pp.0910061-0910069.

Google Scholar

[14] ASTM D2229-10, Standard test method for adhesion between steel tire cords and rubber, (2010).

Google Scholar