Circumferences Lead to Enhancements of Nonresonant Third-Order Susceptibilities for Carbon Nanotube Bundles

Wen Dan Cheng; Chen Sheng Lin; Hao Zhang

doi:10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.415-417.1200

Paper Titles

Effect of Different Aging Temperatures on Interfacial Reaction between SAC305 and ENEPIG Surface Finish
p.1181

Influence of Combined Processes between Gas Soft Nitriding and Carburizing to Hardness of Low Carbon Steel
p.1186

The Discovery and Preliminary Analysis of an Ancient Kiln Site near Cao Village in Linzhang Town of Hebei Province
p.1190

Synthesis and Characterization of Siloxane-Modified Polyurethane Dispersion/Clay Nanocomposites
p.1196

Circumferences Lead to Enhancements of Nonresonant Third-Order Susceptibilities for Carbon Nanotube Bundles
p.1200

Preparation and Characterization of the Lignocellulose Aerogel
p.1207

The Research on the Interfacial Adhesion of Polypropylene-Magesium Hydroxide Composite Modified by Different Compatibilizers
p.1211

Quantitatively Ca₃SiO₅ Particles Adherence Affected the Teeth Enamel Remineralization
p.1215

Measure of the Photosynthetic Efficiency of the Ficus Altissima Leaves by Using Photo-Acoustic Tomography Spectroscopy Technology
p.1219

HomeAdvanced Materials ResearchAdvanced Materials Research Vols. 415-417Circumferences Lead to Enhancements of Nonresonant...

Circumferences Lead to Enhancements of Nonresonant Third-Order Susceptibilities for Carbon Nanotube Bundles

Abstract:

Nonresonant enhancements of third-order susceptibility χ(3)(-ω; ω, ω, -ω) have been investigated for zigzag carbon nanotube (n,0) bundles (n = 5, 7, 11, 13, 8, 10, 14, 16) based on the energy band theory combined with the classic anharmonic oscillator model. The obtained results show that the (3) values increase as circumference of tube varies in the order of 5<7<11<13 and 8<10<14<16 for (n,0) tube bundles, respectively. The origination of the large third-order susceptibility is ascribed to the circumference effect of individual tube. The nonresonant third-order susceptibility is estimated to be about 10-6 esu in the axial direction of (16,0) tube bundles, and it is possible for a good candidate to make optical phase conjugate device.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

View Preview

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 415-417)

Pages:

1200-1203

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.415-417.1200

Citation:

Cite this paper

Online since:

December 2011

Authors:

Wen Dan Cheng, Chen Sheng Lin, Hao Zhang

Keywords:

Anharmonic Oscillator Model, Carbon Nanotube Bundles, DFT Calculation, Third-Order Susceptibility

Export:

RIS, BibTeX

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Request Permissions

Permissions PLS:

Request Permissions

Сopyright:

Citation:

References

[1] Information on http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nonlinear_optics

Google Scholar

[2] G. S. He, Progress in Quantum Electronics 26 (2002), 131–191.

Google Scholar

[3] B. Ya. Zel'dovich, N. F. Pilipetsky, V. V. Shkunov, Principles of Phase Conjugation (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1985).

Google Scholar

[4] G. S. He, S. H. Liu, Physics of Nonlinear Optics (World Scientific, New Jersey, 2000).

Google Scholar

[5] V. T. Tikhonchuk, A. A. Zozulya, Progress in Quantum Electronics 15 (1991), 231–293.

Google Scholar

[6] Vl. A. Margulis , E. A. Gaiduk, E. N. Zhidkin, Diamond and Related Materials 8 (1999), 1240–1245.

DOI: 10.1016/s0925-9635(99)00109-0

Google Scholar

[7] Vl. A. Margulis, E. A. Gaiduk, E.N. Zhidkin, Optics Communications 183 (2000), 317–326.

Google Scholar

[8] Robert W. Boyd, Nonlinear Optics (Academic Press, INC. 1992, pp.21-32).

Google Scholar

[9] M. Segall, P. Lindan, M. Probert, C. Pickard, P. Hasnip, S. Clark, M. Payne, Materials Studio CASTEP, version 2.2, 2002.

Google Scholar

[10] F. Bassani, G. P. Parravicini, Electronic States and Optical Transitions in Solids, (Pergamon, New York, 1975, pp.149-154).

Google Scholar

[11] Information on http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kramers%E2%80%93Kronig_relation.

Google Scholar