Use of Impact Testing to Assess the Softness of Bedding Materials

Abstract:

Bedding materials are very important for cows in freestalls, because they can provide a high degree of comfort to these cows. But techniques of assessing their surface comfort on in the field still remain rather subjective. The objective of this study was to assess softness of bedding materials for use in cow free-stall bases in China. The Clegg Impact values of rubber-coated slatted floor, Solid wood floor and concrete floor are measured in order to compare with the value of pasture. The softest bedding material was the wood (40.43CIV/L) followed by rubber-coated slatted floor (64.23 CIV/L). The hardest material was the concrete floor (132.21 CIV/L).Clegg Impact Tester with a 1-kg hammer was used in this study. The impact of the hammer on bedding materials results in a digital display based on peak deceleration of the hammer’s impact with the free-stall base in tens of gravities (CIV/L). The CIV/L value, as measured by the Clegg Impact hammer, is based on peak deceleration of the 1-kg hammer’s impact with the surface, from a height of 30 cm. The reasonable suggestions of bedding materials used as the free-stall bases are recommended for the farmer in China.

• Periodical: Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 415-417)
• Pages: 2215-2218
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.415-417.2215
• Online since: December 2011
• Authors: De Ling Zhao, Xiao Hou Shao
• Keywords: Concrete, Impact Values, Rubber, Wood

References

[1] Ken Nordlund, and Nigel B. Cook A Flowchart For Evaluating Dairy Cow Free-stalls, Published in Bovine Practitioner 37: 89-96, 2003.

DOI: 10.21423/bovine-vol37no2p89-96

[2] Nilsson, C. 1992. Walking and lying surfaces in livestock houses. Pages 93–110 in Farm Animals and the Environment. CAB Int., Wallingford, UK.

[3] Sonck, B., J. Daelemans, and J. Langenakens. 1999. Preference test for free stall surface material for dairy cows. Paper no. 994011 in Proc. Am. Soc. of Agric. Eng., Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

[4] Boone, R.E., R. A. Bucklin and D. R. Bray. 2010. Comparison of Freestall Bedding Materials and Their Effect on Cow Behavior and Cow Health Applied Engineering in Agriculture.. 26(6): 1051-1060.

DOI: 10.13031/2013.35909

[5] Tucker, C. B., and D. M. Weary. 2001. Stall design: Enhancing cow comfort. Adv. Dairy Tech. 13:155–168.

[6] Gaworski, M. A., C. B. Tucker, D. M. Weary, and M. L. Swift. 2003.Effects of stall design on dairy cattle behavior. Pages 139–146 in Proc. 5th Int. Dairy Housing, Fort Worth, TX.

DOI: 10.13031/2013.11614

[7] Tierney, G., and R. Thomson. 2003. Methods for assessing the cushioning performance of free-stall dairy cow synthetic beds. Trans. ASAE 46:147–153.

DOI: 10.13031/2013.12542

[8] W. K. Fulwider and R. W. Palmer.2004. Use of Impact Testing to Predict Softness, Cow Preference, and Hardening Over Time of Stall Bases. J. Dairy Sci. 87:3080–3088

DOI: 10.3168/jds.s0022-0302(04)73442-6

[9] ASTM Standard D 5874-02. 2007. Standard Test Method for Determination of the Impact Value (IV) of a Soil. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA.

[10] ASTM Standard F 1702-96. 2002. Standard Test Method for Measuring Shock-Attenuation Characteristics of Natural Playing Surface Systems Using Lightweight Portable Apparatus. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA.

DOI: 10.1520/f1702-96r02e01