The Review on Project Management of Wood Carbon Sequestration Materials

Abstract:

The forest carbon sinks play an important role in controlling the Greenhouse Gas emissions. The project management of wood carbon sequestration materials will be helpful to attract more and more enterprises to step into forestation, reforestation and technology development for improvement of forest management. That will create a sustainable situation that governments, NGO and corporations join together. Based on the domestic and foreign literature, the paper sorts out the current literature in the direction of forest carbon sequestration managements are from five aspects such as, carbon policy, carbon sequestration, carbon conservation, carbon substitution, carbon benefits. Based on this, the paper puts forward the policy and the long-term objectives of wood carbon sequestration materials should be integration of the implementation.

• Periodical: Advanced Materials Research (Volume 427)
• Pages: 203-207
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.427.203
• Online since: January 2012
• Authors: Yu Shu Cui, Hong Ling Shao, Li Yan Ma
• Keywords: Carbon Benefits, Carbon Conservation, Carbon Sequestration, Carbon Substitution, Forest Carbon Sinks

References

[1] S. Pacala and R. Socolow: Stabilization Wedges: Solving the Climate Problem for the Next 50 Years with Current Technologies[J]. Science 13 AugustVol. 305. no. 5686, (2004), p.968 – 972.

DOI: 10.1126/science.1100103

[2] Aoyagi-Usui M: An analysis of the effective factors for promoting proenvironmental actions from the Information gain and social capital point of view. Review of Environmental Economics and Policy Studies, 1, (2008), p.37–50.

[3] Benítez, P. McCallum, I. Obersteiner and M. Global: Supply for Carbon Sequestration: Identifying Least-Cost Afforestation Sites Under Country Risk Considerations. Laxenburg, Austria, IIASA IR-04-022. ( 2004. ).

[4] D.R. Lin and Z.Y. Li: LI Impacts and Inspirations of REDD Mechanism on Multifunctional Forest Management in China[J]. World Forestry Research, 3, (2011), pp.23-25.

[5] Sampei Y and Aoyagi-Usui M: Mass-media coverage, its influence on public awareness of climate-change issues, and implications for Japan's national campaign to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. Global Environmental Change, 9(2), (2009), pp.203-212.

DOI: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2008.10.005

[6] E.K. Skog: Sequestration of carbon in harvested wood products for the United States. Forest Products Journal, 58(6), (2008), pp.56-72.

[7] A.K. Hassett, M. Aparna and M.E. Gilbert: The incidence of a U.S. carbon tax: a lifetime and regional analysis. Forthcoming, The Energy Journal, thirty, (2009).

[8] The Research On Forest response to global climate change and policy mechanism in China[J]. Issues in Agricultural Economy, Vol. 7 (2010), pp.105-109.

[9] N.R. Stavins and R.K. Richards: The cost of U.S. forest-based carbon sequestration. Prepared for the pew center on global climate change. Available on line at(2009).

[10] D.R. Simpson, R.A. Sedjo and J.W. Reid: Valuing Biodiversity for Use in Pharmaceutical Research[J]. Political Economy, Vol. 104 (1996), p.163 – 185.

DOI: 10.1086/262021

[11] Forestry Research Institute In response to the Kyoto Protocol, Annual Report, forest management strategies Extend the life cycle of forest products and technology research(2008).

[12] E.K. Skog: 2008. Sequestration of carbon in harvested wood products for the United States. Forest Products Journal, Vol. 6(2008), p.56.

[13] Dooley, K., Griffiths, T., Leake, H. and Ozinga, S. World Bank's forest and carbon fund fails forests and people Available online at http: /www. fern. org/media/documents/document, (2008).

[14] Discussion on International Carbon Market and Forestry Carbon Sink Trade in China[J]. China Development . Vol. 3 (2008), p.105.