Influences of Obstacles Installed in the Container on the Superheated Liquid Boiling

Article Preview

Abstract:

During the accident mechanism investigation of Boiling Liquid Expanding Vapor Explosion (BLEVE), numerous dada shows that overheated liquid explosive boiling is the main reason and driving force to cause accidents. Research on the micro-process of overheated liquid instant boiling in BLEVE as well as the microscopic mechanism to influence this process development under different device conditions is favorable to seek the preventive and control measures for this accident. In this paper, regarding the mesh obstacle provided inside the storage tank, high-speed camera technology has been utilized to shoot the boiling process during continuous leakage of the storage tank, and the influence of the obstacle on the overheated liquid boiling has been tested and analyzed. It is found out that the boiling process of overheated liquid has been delayed. When the bubbles are rising, the growth process has been suppressed, after passing the obstacle, the movement speed and volume has been decreased, and the upward expansion speed of two-phase flow has also been decreased.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

62-66

Citation:

Online since:

January 2012

Authors:

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2012 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] CCPS, Guidelines for Evaluating the Characteristics of Vapor Cloud Explosions, Flash Fires and BLEVEs, Center for Chemical Process Safety, AIChE, New York, NY, (1994) 6.

DOI: 10.1002/9780470938157

Google Scholar

[2] J.E.S. Venart, BOILING LIQUID EXPANDING VAPOUR EXPLOSIONS (BLEVE); Two-phase aspects of failure. 39th. European Two-Phase Flow Group Meeting: Aveiro, Portugal, 17-20 June (2001).

Google Scholar

[3] A.M. Birk, Scale effects with fire exposure of pressure-liquefied gas tanks, J. Loss Prevent. Process Ind. 8 (5) 275-290 (1995).

DOI: 10.1016/0950-4230(95)00028-y

Google Scholar

[4] S. Ramier, J E S. Venart, BLEVE; dynamic two-phase re-pressurization and discharge, IChemE Hazards XV; Symp. Series No. 147, 527-538 (2000).

Google Scholar

[5] E. Planas-Cuchi, J.M. Salla, J. Casal, Calculating overpressure from BLEVE explosions, J. Loss Prevent. Process Ind. 17, 431-436 (2004).

DOI: 10.1016/j.jlp.2004.08.002

Google Scholar

[6] A.C. van den Berg, M.M. van der Voort, J. Weerheijm & N.H.A. Versloot, Expansion-controlled evaporation: a safe approach to BLEVE blast, J. Loss Prevent. Process Ind. 17, 397-405 (2004).

DOI: 10.1016/j.jlp.2004.07.002

Google Scholar

[7] J. Stawcyk, Experimental evaluation of LPG tank explosion hazards, J. Hazard. Mater. B96, 189-200 (2003).

Google Scholar

[8] S.N. Chen, J.H. Sun, G.Q. Chu Small scale experiments on boiling liquid expanding vapor explosions: Vessel over-pressure Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries 20, 45-51 (2007).

DOI: 10.1016/j.jlp.2006.09.002

Google Scholar

[9] S.N. Chen, J.H. Sun, W. Wan Boiling liquid expanding vapor explosion: Experimental research in the evolution of the two-phase flow and over-pressure Journal of Hazardous Materials 156, 530-537 (2008).

DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2007.12.074

Google Scholar

[10] C.M. Yu, Venart J E S. Transient analysis of a volumetric heating system during depressurization. Journal of Engineering Thermophysics, 15(2), 206-209 (1994).

Google Scholar