Probabilistic Seismic Risk Assessment for Transportation Network

Article Preview

Abstract:

This paper presents a probabilistic seismic risk assessment methodology developed for Highway Bridge including models for transportation network analysis, hazard estimation, and seismic performance of highway components and evaluation of the economic impact to serve as a tool in the decision process for earthquake disaster management including pre-earthquake and post earthquake actions. This study is focused on the development of a procedure for seismic risk assessment, based on a probabilistic seismic hazard analysis.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 446-449)

Pages:

2351-2356

Citation:

Online since:

January 2012

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2012 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Xie Lili. Lessons learnt from the great Sichuan Wenchuan Earthquake [J]. Chinese engineering science, 2009.6:28-35(In Chinese)

Google Scholar

[2] Chen Qifu, Wang Kelin. The 2008 Wenchuan earthquake and earthquake prediction in China [J]. Translated World Seismology, 2010.5:34-54

Google Scholar

[3] Guan Zhongguo, Li Jianzhong, Fan Lichu. Rational seismic fortification for highway bridges [J].China Civil Engineering Journal, 2010, 43(4):99-104

Google Scholar

[4] Ellingwood B R, Kinali K. Quantifying and communicating uncertainty in seismic risk assessment [J]. Structural Safety, 2009.31(2):179-187

DOI: 10.1016/j.strusafe.2008.06.001

Google Scholar

[5] Basoz N I. Risk assessment for highway transportation systems [D]. Stanford University, (1996)

Google Scholar

[6] Kyriazis P, Maria A. Earthquake risk assessment of lifelines [J]. Bull Earthquake Eng, 2006. 4:365–390

Google Scholar

[7] D Asprone, F Jalayer, A Prota, G Manfredi. Proposal of a probabilistic model for multi-hazard risk assessment of structures [J]. Structural Safety, 2010(32):25-34

DOI: 10.1016/j.strusafe.2009.04.002

Google Scholar

[8] FEMA 445. Next-Generation Performance-Based Seismic Design Guidelines[R], 2006.8

Google Scholar

[9] Anne K, James M. Risk Assessment of Transportation Network Systems [J]. Journal of Earthquake Engineering, 2007(11):371–382

Google Scholar

[10] Brendon A B, Dominic S L. Accuracy of approximate methods of uncertainty propagation in seismic loss estimation [J] . Structural Safety, 2010 (32): 13-24

DOI: 10.1016/j.strusafe.2009.04.001

Google Scholar

[11] Z M WANG. Seismic Hazard Assessment: Issues and Alternatives. Pure and Applied Geophysics [J]. 2010.5:1-15

Google Scholar

[12] Furen Xie, Zhenming Wang, Jingwei Liu. Seismic Hazard and Risk Assessments for Beijing, Tianjin and Tangshan, China, Area [J]. Pure and Applied Geophysics, 2010(3): 8-15

DOI: 10.1007/s00024-010-0115-z

Google Scholar

[13] A KIJKO, S J P RETIEF, G GRAHAM. Seismic Hazard and Risk Assessment for Tulbagh South Africa-Part II: Assessment of Seismic Risk [J]. Natural Hazards, 2003(30): 25-41

Google Scholar

[14] Jens U K. Seismic Hazard Analysis- Quo Vadis [J]. Earth Science Reviews, 2008 (88) :1–32

DOI: 10.1016/j.earscirev.2008.01.003

Google Scholar

[15] Seth G. Reliability Estimation for Networks of Reinforced Concrete Bridges [J]. Journal of Infrastructure System, 2009, 15(2): 61-69

Google Scholar

[16] Kiremidjian A, Moore J. Seismic Risk Assessment of Transportation Network Systems [J]. Journal of Earthquake Engineering, May2009, 11 (3):371-382

Google Scholar

[17] Mark G Stewart. Acceptable Risk Criteria for Infrastructure Protection [J]. International Journal of Protective Structures, 2010(1):23-40

Google Scholar