An Analysis of Embodied Carbon between Different Types of Residential Buildings in China

Article Preview

Abstract:

Using the method of lifecycle assessment (LCA) and building information model (BIM), this paper compares quantitatively the embodied carbon levels of three typical residential buildings: a five-storied townhouse, a fourteen-storied medium high-rise and a thirty-storied high-rise. This study consequently finds out that, in a specific period (i.e. from cradle to site), the medium high-rise emits the least embodied carbon and therefore is preferable in this respect.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 450-451)

Pages:

1557-1561

Citation:

Online since:

January 2012

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2012 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Loh, J: Living Planet Report 2002 (2002)

Google Scholar

[2] Information on http://finance.eastday.com/

Google Scholar

[3] ISO14040, 2006 Environmental Management: Life Cycle Assessment Principles and framework (International Standards Organization, Paris, 2006).

Google Scholar

[4] G. Hammond, C. Jones, Embodied energy and carbon in construction materials, in: Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers: Energy, 161 (2008), p.87–98.

DOI: 10.1680/ener.2008.161.2.87

Google Scholar

[5] NREL, US Lifecycle Inventory Database, NREL, (2008).

Google Scholar

[6] WRAP, Current Practices and Future Potential in Modern Methods of Construction WAS003-001: Full Final Report, Waste Resources and Action Program, (2007).

Google Scholar

[7] M.G. Van Geem and M.L. Marceau: Energy Performance of concrete buildings in five climates in First International Conference on Building Energy and Environment, Proceedings vols.1-3, (2008).

Google Scholar