Production and Characterization of Bioemulsifiers by Thermotolerant Bacteria for Enhanced Oil Recovery Potential

Article Preview

Abstract:

Three bacterial strains were isolated from oil contaminated soil samples in Yumen oilfield of China and selected due to their capacity of growing under extreme conditions and production of bioemulsifier. The isolates were identified as Brevibacillus sp. XS1, Geobacillus sp. XS2 and Geobacillus sp. XS3 according to 16S rDNA sequence and physiological methods, respectively. The isolates XS1, XS2 and XS3 were thermotolerant with the optimum growth temperature of 50 °C, 60 °C and 55 °C, respectively. All the three isolates were able to produce bioemulsifiers which had little effect on surface tension reduction. The bioemusifiers produced by the three isolates were purified with a production yield of 2.98g/L, 4.24g/L and 3.82 g/L, respectively. The bioemulsifiers were identified as anionic heteropolysaccharides by FTIR analysis and their average molecular weight and polydispersity were investigated by GPC method. The bioemulsifiers produced by Geobacillus sp. XS2 and XS3 exhibited a perfect stability over various temperature (up to 100 °C), pH (range from 2.0 to 12.0) and salinity (up to 30.0% of NaCl concentration) and were considered to be ideal candidates in MEOR process.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 450-451)

Pages:

573-581

Citation:

Online since:

January 2012

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2012 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Javaheri, M., Jenneman, G.E., McInerney, M.J., Knapp, R.M., 1985, Anaerobic Production of a Biosurfactant by Bacillus licheniformis JF-2. Appl Environ Microbiol 50, 698-700.

DOI: 10.1128/aem.50.3.698-700.1985

Google Scholar

[2] Youssef, N.H., Duncan, K.E., Nagle, D.P., Savage, K.N., Knapp, R.M., McInerney, M.J., 2004, Comparison of methods to detect biosurfactant production by diverse microorganisms. J Microbiol Methods 56, 339-347.

DOI: 10.1016/j.mimet.2003.11.001

Google Scholar

[3] Ghojavand, H., Vahabzadeh, F., Mehranian, M., Radmehr, M., Shahraki Kh, A., Zolfagharian, F., Emadi, M.A., Roayaei, E., 2008, Isolation of thermotolerant, halotolerant, facultative biosurfactant-producing bacteria. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 80, 1073-1085.

DOI: 10.1007/s00253-008-1570-7

Google Scholar

[4] Smitinont, T., Tansakul, C., Tanasupawat, S., Keeratipibul, S., Navarini, L., Bosco, M., Cescutti, P., 1999, Exopolysaccharide-producing lactic acid bacteria strains from traditional Thai fermented foods: isolation, identification and exopolysaccharide characterization. Int J Food Microbiol 51, 105-111.

DOI: 10.1016/s0168-1605(99)00094-x

Google Scholar

[5] Gauri, S.S., Mandal, S.M., Mondal, K.C., Dey, S., Pati, B.R., 2009, Enhanced production and partial characterization of an extracellular polysaccharide from newly isolated Azotobacter sp. SSB81. Bioresour Technol 100, 4240-4243.

DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2009.03.064

Google Scholar

[6] Li, Q.X., Kang, C.B., Wang, H., Liu, C.D., Zhang, C.K., 2002, Application of microbial enhanced oil recovery technique to Daqing Oilfield. Biochem Eng J 11, 197-199.

DOI: 10.1016/s1369-703x(02)00025-6

Google Scholar

[7] Suthar, H., Hingurao, K., Desai, A., Nerurkar, A., 2009, Selective Plugging Strategy Based Microbial Enhanced Oil Recovery Using Bacillus licheniformis TT33. J Microbiol Biotechn 19, 1230-1237.

Google Scholar

[8] Bao, M.T., Kong, X.P., Jiang, G.C., Wang, X.L., Li, X.M., 2009, Laboratory study on activating indigenous microorganisms to enhance oil recovery in Shengli Oilfield. J Petrol Sci Eng 66, 42-46.

DOI: 10.1016/j.petrol.2009.01.001

Google Scholar

[9] Saitou, N., Nei, M., 1987, The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol Biol Evol 4, 406-425.

Google Scholar

[10] Wang, L., Tang, Y., Wang, S., Liu, R.L., Liu, M.Z., Zhang, Y., Liang, F.L., Feng, L., 2006, Isolation and characterization of a novel thermophilic Bacillus strain degrading long-chain n-alkanes. Extremophiles 10, 347-356.

DOI: 10.1007/s00792-006-0505-4

Google Scholar

[11] Lin, S.C., Minton, M.A., Sharma, M.M., Georgiou, G., 1994, Structural and Immunological Characterization of a Biosurfactant Produced by Bacillus-Licheniformis Jf-2. Appl Environ Microb 60, 31-38.

DOI: 10.1128/aem.60.1.31-38.1994

Google Scholar

[12] Joshi, S., Bharucha, C., Desai, A.J., 2008, Production of biosurfactant and antifungal compound by fermented food isolate Bacillus subtilis 20B. Bioresour Technol 99, 4603-4608.

DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2007.07.030

Google Scholar

[13] Cao, M.F., Song, C.J., Jin, Y.H., Liu, L., Liu, J., Xie, H., Guo, W.B., Wang, S.F., 2010, Synthesis of poly (gamma-glutamic acid) and heterologous expression of pgsBCA genes. J Mol Catal B-Enzym 67, 111-116.

DOI: 10.1016/j.molcatb.2010.07.014

Google Scholar

[14] Mulligan, C.N., 2005, Environmental applications for biosurfactants. Environ Pollut 133, 183-198.

Google Scholar

[15] Batista, S.B., Mounteer, A.H., Amorim, F.R., Totola, M.R., 2006, Isolation and characterization of biosurfactant/bioemulsifier-producing bacteria from petroleum contaminated sites. Bioresour Technol 97, 868-875.

DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2005.04.020

Google Scholar

[16] Ganesh Kumar, C., Joo, H.S., Choi, J.W., Koo, Y.M., Chang, C.S., 2004, Purification and characterization of an extracellular polysaccharide from haloalkalophilic Bacillus sp I-450. Enzyme Microb Tech 34, 673-681.

DOI: 10.1016/j.enzmictec.2004.03.001

Google Scholar

[17] Banat, I.M., Rancich, I., Casarino, P., 2002, Biosurfactants and environmental improvement in the oil and petrochemical industry and the ecosystem. Remediation and Beneficial Reuse of Contaminated Sediments, 95-102.

Google Scholar

[18] Bognolo, G., 1999, Biosurfactants as emulsifying agents for hydrocarbons. Colloid Surface A 152, 41-52.

Google Scholar

[19] Dastgheib, S.M., Amoozegar, M.A., Elahi, E., Asad, S., Banat, I.M., 2008a, Bioemulsifier production by a halothermophilic Bacillus strain with potential applications in microbially enhanced oil recovery. Biotechnol Lett 30, 263-270.

DOI: 10.1007/s10529-007-9530-3

Google Scholar

[20] Dastgheib, S.M.M., Amoozegar, M.A., Elahi, E., Asad, S., Banat, I.M., 2008b, Bioemulsifier production by a halothermophilic Bacillus strain with potential applications in microbially enhanced oil recovery. Biotechnology Letters 30, 263-270.

DOI: 10.1007/s10529-007-9530-3

Google Scholar

[21] Youssef, N.H., Duncan, K.E., McInerney, M.J., 2005, Importance of 3-hydroxy fatty acid composition of lipopeptides for biosurfactant activity. Appl Environ Microbiol 71, 7690-7695.

DOI: 10.1128/aem.71.12.7690-7695.2005

Google Scholar

[22] Rosenberg, E., and E. Z. Ron. 1999. High and low molecular mass microbial surfactants. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 52:154–162.

Google Scholar

[23] Sen, R., 2008, Biotechnology in petroleum recovery: The microbial EOR. Prog Energ Combust 34, 714-724.

Google Scholar

[24] Yakimov, M.M., Amro, M.M., Bock, M., Boseker, K., Fredrickson, H.L., Kessel, D.G., Timmis, K.N., 1997, The potential of Bacillus licheniformis strains for in situ enhanced oil recovery. J Petrol Sci Eng 18, 147-160.

DOI: 10.1016/s0920-4105(97)00015-6

Google Scholar

[25] Bordoloi, N.K., Konwar, B.K., 2008, Microbial surfactant-enhanced mineral oil recovery under laboratory conditions. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces 63, 73-82.

DOI: 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2007.11.006

Google Scholar

[26] Youssef, N., Simpson, D.R., Duncan, K.E., McInerney, M.J., Folmsbee, M., Fincher, T., Knapp, R.M., 2007, In situ biosurfactant production by Bacillus strains injected into a limestone petroleum reservoir. Appl Environ Microb 73, 1239-1247. Table 1. Morphological and physiological characteristics of isolates XS1, XS2 and XS3 Table 2. Cell growth, emulsification index, surface tension, culture viscosity and biomulsifier production of the isolates in MS medium XS1 XS2 XS3 Gram Staining +a + + Shape of cell Short rods Rods Rods Oxygen requirements A/AN b A/AN A/AN Spore formation + + + Gas/Acid from glucose -/+ -/+ +/- H2S form - - - Starch - - + Citrate utilization - - + Nitrate reduction + + + Hydrolysis of lipid + + + Hydrolysis of urea - - + a +, positive reaction; -, negative reaction; b A, aerobic; AN, anaerobic. Control XS1 XS2 XS3 O.D.600 0 2.793 2.034 2.418 Emulsification Index, % 5 52 60 50 Surface tension, mN/m 68 49 42 45 Culture viscosity, mPa.s 1.24 1.94 3.18 2.44 Bioemulsifier yield, g/L - 2.98 4.24 3.82 Table 3. The number-average molecular weight, weight-average molecular weight and polydispersity index of the bioemulsifiers Mn, Da Mw, Da PDI Bioemulsifier produced by XS1 Peak I 362013 399812 1.104 Peak II 19596 20135 1.028 Bioemulsifier produced by XS 2 Peak I 271785 318140 1.171 Peak II 12588 13411 1.065 Bioemulsifier produced by XS 3 Peak I 526369 540468 1.027 Peak II 44106 45874 1.040 Peak III 14975 15085 1.007 Fig. 1 Phylogenetic tree of the isolates XS1, XS2 and XS3. 16S rDNA gene phylotypes and closely related sequences from NCBI database. The topology shown was obtained with the Neighbor-joining method Fig. 2 The effects of temperature, pH and salinity on microbial growth of the isolates (■, Brevibacilis sp. XS1; ▲, Geobacillus sp. XS2; ●, Geobacillus sp. XS3) Fig. 3 The effects of temperature, pH and salinity on emulsification activity

Google Scholar