Paper Titles
RWMS: RFID Based Weapon Management System
p.386
A New Remote Video Monitoring Network System Based on Protocol Detection and Video Compression Identification
p.391
Study on the Relationship between BPR Strategy for Enterprises and ERP Performance-Evidence from China
p.396
Properties of Surface Layers Processed by a New, High-Temperature Vacuum Carburizing Technology with Prenitriding - PreNitLPC®
p.401
Comparison of Supply Chain Consigning Collaborative Innovation Modes
p.407
Empirical Research on Effect of Managerial Discretion on CEO Pay: Monitoring Intensity as Moderator Variable
p.412
Fire Robot's Operation Quality Base on Sperling Value
p.417
The Development and Research of the Automatic Generation of Expert System of Garment Cad Pattern
p.421
The Research of Methods of Pricing of Human Capital Based on Optimal Allocation of Residual Claims
p.426

Comparison of Supply Chain Consigning Collaborative Innovation Modes

Article Preview

Abstract:

In this paper, we have constructed supply chain consigning collaborative innovation modes and explored the innovation game process involving supplier, manufacturer and third-party research firm where the manufacturer acting as a core firm. We consider innovation cost coefficient information symmetry and asymmetry. The research shows that supplier’s innovation effect is more direct to supply chain. When innovation ability is similar, no matter judging from innovation inputs, expect profits or demand quantities, the mode of the supplier consigning innovation is superior to that with third-party and non-collaborative innovation.

You might also be interested in these eBooks
Management, Manufacturing and Materials Engineering View Preview

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 452-453)

Pages:

407-411

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.452-453.407

Citation:

Cite this paper

Online since:

January 2012

Authors:

Wei Tian, Li Zhou

Keywords:

Consigning Collaborative Innovation, Game, Mode, Supply Chain

Export:

RIS, BibTeX

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Request Permissions

Permissions PLS:

Request Permissions

Сopyright:

© 2012 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

References

[1] S. R. Bhaskran, V. Krishnan. Effort, revenue, and cost sharing mechanisms for collaborative new product development. Management Science, Vol. 55(7) (2009), pp.1152-116.

DOI: 10.1287/mnsc.1090.1010

Google Scholar

[2] R. A. Burgelman, C. M. Christensen, S. C. Wheelwright. Strategic management of technology and innovation[M]. McGraw-Hill/Irwin(2008).

Google Scholar

[3] R. K. Chandy, G. J. Tellis. The incumbent's curse? Incumbency, size, and radical product innovation. Journal of Marketing, Vol. 64(2000), p.1–17.

DOI: 10.1509/jmkg.64.3.1.18033

Google Scholar

[4] C. Corbett, G. DeCroix. Shared savings contracts for indirect materials in supply chains: Channel profits and environmental impacts. Management Science, Vol. 47(7) (2001), pp.881-893.

DOI: 10.1287/mnsc.47.7.881.9802

Google Scholar

[5] S. Dutta, A. M. Weiss. The relationship between a form's level of technological innovativeness and its pattern of partnership agreements. Management Science, Vol. 43(3)( 1997) , pp.343-356.

DOI: 10.1287/mnsc.43.3.343

Google Scholar

[6] M. S. Gilbert, V. Cvsa. Strategic commitment to price to stimulate downstream innovation in a supply chain. European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 150(2003), pp.617-639.

DOI: 10.1016/s0377-2217(02)00590-8

Google Scholar

[7] K. Gronhaug, G. Kaufmann. Innovation: a Cross Disciplinary Perspective. Norwegian University Press, Oslo(1988).

Google Scholar

[8] S. Gupta, R. Loulou. Process innovation, product differentiation, and channel structure: Strategic incentives in a duoploy. Marketing Sci., Vol. 17(4) (1998), p.301–316.

DOI: 10.1287/mksc.17.4.301

Google Scholar

[9] P. W. Roberts. Product innovation, product market competition and persistent profitability in the US pharmaceutical industry. Strategic Management Journal 20(1999), p.655–670.

DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0266(199907)20:7<655::aid-smj44>3.0.co;2-p

Google Scholar

[10] R. C. Sampson. R&D alliances and firm performance: the impact of technological diversity and alliance organization on innovation. Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 50(2)(2007) , p.364–386.

DOI: 10.5465/amj.2007.24634443

Google Scholar