Cooperative Target Allocation for UCAV Team Air-to-Ground Attack Based on Decision Graph Bayesian Optimization Algorithm

Article Preview

Abstract:

In order to control and optimize cooperative air-to-ground attack decision-making of the unmanned combat aerial vehicle (UCAV) team, the principle of income maximum and loss minimum of UCAV team is built firstly. Accordingly, the mathematical model of cooperative target allocation is built based on the decision variables and constraints. Then Bayesian optimization algorithm (BOA) is introduced which is one kind of the evolution algorithm. For improving the ability of the BOA, decision graph is introduced to enhance the represent and learn of Bayesian network and compress the parameter saving. Finally decision graph Bayesian optimization algorithm (DBOA) is utilized to optimize and analyze the model. The simulation results verify that the mathematical model of cooperative target allocation can reflect the importance of cooperative decision-making, the DBOA can converge quickly to the global optimal solution and can effectively solve the cooperative target allocation problem of UCAV team air-to-ground attack.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 457-458)

Pages:

655-662

Citation:

Online since:

January 2012

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2012 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Jose B. Cruz, Jr., Genshe Chen, Denis Garagic, et al: Team Dynamics and Tactics for Mission Planning, Proceedings of the 42nd IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (2003), pp.3579-3583.

DOI: 10.1109/cdc.2003.1271703

Google Scholar

[2] Zhifu SHI: Study on Intelligent Decision-making of Air-to-Ground Atack with UCAV Teams Based on Bayesian Network, Doctor dissertation (2007).

Google Scholar

[3] Schumacher C, Chandler P, Pachter M, et al: Constrained optimization for UAV task assignment, Proceedings of the AIAA Guidance, Navigation, and Control Conference (2004), p.3152~3165.

DOI: 10.2514/6.2004-5352

Google Scholar

[4] Jianhu CHEN, Zhiming LV: Fuzzy Multi-Targets Programming of Weapon-Target Allocation, Oranance Industry Automation, Vol. 26, No. 6 (2007), pp.3-4.

Google Scholar

[5] Jinjin DAI, Xiangmin LI, Yongqin SUN, et al: Study on Method of Target Allocation for Multi-formation Air-to-ground Attacking, Journal of System Simulation, Vol. 21, No. 8 (2009), pp.2148-2151.

Google Scholar

[6] Martin Pelikan, E. Goldberg David: BOA: the Bayesian Optimization Algorithm, Illinois Genetic Algorithms Laboratory Report, No. 99003 (1999).

Google Scholar

[7] Pelikan M, Sastry K, Goldberg D E: Scalability of the Bayesian optimization algorithm, International Journal of Approximate Reasoning, Vol. 31, No. 3 (2002), pp.221-258.

DOI: 10.1016/s0888-613x(02)00095-6

Google Scholar

[8] Martin Pelikan, E. Goldberg David: Bayesian Optimization Algorithm, Decision Graphs, and Occam's Razor, Illinois Genetic Algorithms Laboratory Report, No. 2000020 (2000).

Google Scholar

[9] Zhouyi YU, Zongji CHEN, and Rui ZHOU: Study on Algorithm of Threat Level Assessment Based on Bayesian Network, Journal of System Simulation, Vol. 17, No. 3 (2005), pp.555-558.

Google Scholar

[10] Y. Katsumata, T. Terano: Bayesian optimization algorithm for multi-objective solutions: application to electric equipment configuration problems in a power plant, The 2003 Congress on Evolutionary Computation, Vol. 2 (2003), pp.1101-1107.

DOI: 10.1109/cec.2003.1299791

Google Scholar