Analysis of a Fluxgate Incorporating Demagnetization Field

Article Preview

Abstract:

It is not accurate incorporating the demagnetizing field by the average demagnetizing factor due to the time variations of the permeability and the dependence of the demagnetization field on the permeability of the sample material. Especially when the magnetic field changes with the position greatly, the local demagnetizing tensor can't be simplified as a number D, thus the internal field H can't be described by demagnetization coefficient D. Although the transient magnetic simulation using the finite-element method can give a correct result, the computation time is relatively too long. Especially for voltage source excitation, a number of trial transient magnetic simulations have to be performed to find the suitable number of winding, the voltage supply, and the excitation frequency. To reduce the optimization time, a method was proposed in this work. With our method only one transient magnetic simulation with current source excitation using the finite-element method was needed. Optimization can be performed using HSPICE. Experiment results confirmed the validity of our method.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 476-478)

Pages:

1425-1428

Citation:

Online since:

February 2012

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2012 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Héctor Trujillo, Juan Cruz, Mairée Rivero, Mario Barrios, Analysis of the fluxgate response through a simple spice model, Sensors and Actuators 75 (1999) 1–7.

DOI: 10.1016/s0924-4247(98)00280-5

Google Scholar

[2] Lucas Pérez, Irene Lucas, Claudio Aroca, Pedro Sénchez, M. Carmen S´anchez, Analytical model for the sensitivity of a toroidal fluxgate sensor, Sensors and Actuators A 130–131 (2006) 142–146.

DOI: 10.1016/j.sna.2005.12.003

Google Scholar

[3] Xiao Hua Huang and M. Pardavi-Horvath, Local demagnetizing tensor calculation for arbitrary non-ellipsoidal bodies, IEEE Trans. Magn. 32 (1996) 4180-4182

DOI: 10.1109/20.539330

Google Scholar

[4] J. Kubík, P. Ripka, Racetrack fluxgate sensor core demagnetization factor, Sensors and Actuators A, (2007) 237-244. Fig.1 Dumbble shape core fluxgate sensor. Fig.2 Differential output voltage using HSPICE. Fig.3 Measured output of the sensor.

DOI: 10.1016/j.sna.2007.10.066

Google Scholar