Formulating an Invariant Manipulability Index of Gough-Stewart Platform

Article Preview

Abstract:

Manipulability indexes have been extensively used as objective functions or constraints in the optimal design of robots, especially for the robots with pure active joints and the end-effectors only involving positioning or orientation. The moving platform of Gough-Stewart platform can involve both positioning and orientation, which leads to the conventional Jacobian matrix with entries bearing disparate physical units, then the established manipulability index based on the conventional Jacobian matrix has no physical meaning and is variable under a change of units. Based on a dimensionless Jacobian matrix, this paper established a new manipulability index, which has physical meaning and is invariant under a change of units. In order to design a good performance motion simulator, the extreme values of the new and old manipulability indexes of 2 commercial flight simulators in their reachable workspaces were found by random search method, respectively. From the results, the extreme values of the new manipulability index are in regularity, and can be used as references in the optimal design of the Gough-Stewart platform as motion simulator.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 479-481)

Pages:

2321-2326

Citation:

Online since:

February 2012

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2012 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] J.P. Merlet: Parallel Robots (Second Edition) (Springer, Netherlands, 2006), pp.70-93

Google Scholar

[2] F. Hao, J.P. Merlet: Mechanism and Machine Theory, Vol.40 (2005) No.2, pp.157-171

Google Scholar

[3] J. Angeles, F. C. Park: in B. Siciliano , O. Khatib (editors), Handbook of Robotics. (Springer,Berlin-Heidelberg, 2008), pp.229-244

Google Scholar

[4] Ou Ma, J. Angeles: Fifth International Conference on Advanced Robotics (Pisa, Italy, Jun, 1991), pp.1130-1135

Google Scholar

[5] K. E. Zanganeh, J. Angeles: International Journal of Robotics Research, Vol.16 (1997) No.2, pp.185-197

Google Scholar

[6] A. Fattah , Ghasemi A. M.Hasan: International Journal of Robotics Research, Vol.21 (2002) No.9, pp.811-824

Google Scholar

[7] C. M. Gosselin: Robotics and Autonomous Systems, Vol.9 (1992) No.4, pp.213-226

Google Scholar

[8] S. G. Kim, J. Ryu: IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation, Vol.19 (2003) No.4 , pp.731-737

Google Scholar

[9] S. Bandyopadhyay, A.Ghosal: Mechanism and Machine Theory, Vol.43 (2008) No.5, pp.591-616

Google Scholar

[10] T.Yoshikawa : International Journal of Robotics Research, Vol.4 (1985) No.2 , pp.3-9

Google Scholar

[11] T.Yoshikawa : Journal of Robotic Systems. Vol.2 (1985) No.1, pp.113-124,.

Google Scholar

[12] K. L. Doty, C. Melchiorri, E. M. Schwartz, C. Bonivento: IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation, Vol.11 (1995) No.3, pp.462-468

DOI: 10.1109/70.388791

Google Scholar

[13] J. P. Merlet: Journal of Mechanical Design, Vol.128 (2006) No.1, pp.199-206

Google Scholar

[14] J. P. Merlet, D. Daney: in Wang Lihui, Xi Jeff (editors), Smart Devices and Machines for Advanced Manufacturing. (Springer, London, 2008), pp.1-25

Google Scholar

[15] J. C. David, B. B. Richard: AIAA Modeling and Simulation Technologies Conference and Exhibit (Providence, Rhode Island, August 2004) , pp.1-10

Google Scholar

[16] Liu Guo-jun, Zheng Shu-tao, Han Jun-wei: Journal of South China University of Technology (Natural Science), Vol.39 (2011) No.4, pp.70-75 (in Chinese)

Google Scholar

[17] L. W. Tsai: Journal of Mechanical Design, Vol.122 (2000) NO.3, pp.3-9

Google Scholar

[18] Tunchan Cura: International Journal of Contemporary Mathematical Sciences, Vol.5 (2010) No.4, pp.179-190

Google Scholar

[19] Ou Ma: Mechanical Analysis of Parallel Manipulators with Simulation, Design and Control Applications (Ph.D., McGill University, Canada 1991), pp.256-258

Google Scholar