Supply Chain Coordination with Option Contracts in VMI System

Article Preview

Abstract:

This paper focuses on the optimal option contract coordinating of ordering quantity and option prices between retailer and supplier in a VMI system under market uncertainty. The option contract is characterized by a dominant supplier with two parameters which are ordering price co and executive price ce paid by retailer. An option ordering price is paid by retailer for each additional ordering unit of product at the end of selling reason if realized demand is larger than retailer’s committed minimum ordering. An executive price plays a role of purchasing price for each unit of product if retailer set a second ordering. A successful coordination has been shown and a numerical analysis demonstrates that such an option contract brings a Pareto improvement to each party, especially to the retailer. At last, the analysis of market uncertainty effects on the profits of both sides illustrates that, as the increasing of market demand uncertainty, the retailer’s ordering quantity of options will increase but his profit will reduce, and supplier’s profit will add.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 482-484)

Pages:

2131-2141

Citation:

Online since:

February 2012

Authors:

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2012 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Blatherwick Andrew. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 1998, 3(1): 10-11.

Google Scholar

[2] Tsan-Ming Choi, Suresh Sethi. International Journal of Production Economics, 2010, 127(1): 1-12.

Google Scholar

[3] Xuhui Wang, Fei Li. China Industrial Economy, 2006, (2).In Chinese.

Google Scholar

[4] Xiangfeng Chen, Guohua Wan. Asia-Pacific Journal of Operational Research, 2011, 28: 457-485.

Google Scholar

[5] Ruoxi Guan, Xiaobo Zhao. European Journal of Operational Research, 2010, 207: 656-667.

Google Scholar

[6] W.K. Wong,J. Qi, S.Y.S. Leung. International Journal of Production Economics, 2009, 120(1): 151-161.

Google Scholar

[7] Yuliang Yao,Yan Dong, Martin Dresner. European Journal of Operational Research, 2010, 203(2): 350-359.

Google Scholar

[8] Yugang Yu,Feng Chu, Haoxun Chen. European Journal of Operational Research, 2009, 192(3): 929-948.

Google Scholar

[9] MJ Fry,R Kapuscinski, TL Olsen. Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, 2001, 3(2): 151-173.

Google Scholar

[10] S.P. Nachiappan, N. Jawahar. European Journal of Operational Research, 2007, 182(3): 1433-1452.

Google Scholar

[11] Jen-Ming Chen,I-Chen Lina, Hung-Liang Cheng. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 2010, 46: 831-843.

Google Scholar

[12] M.A. Darwish, O.M. Odaha. European Journal of Operational Research, 2010, 204: 473-484.

Google Scholar

[13] PH Ritchken, CS Tapiero. Operations Research, 1986, 34(6): 864-870.

Google Scholar

[14] Yingxue Zhao,Shouyang Wang,E. Cheng T. C.,Xiaoqi Yang, Zhimin Huang. European Journal of Operational Research, 2010, 207(2): 668-675.

Google Scholar

[15] Xiaolong Wang, Liwen Liu. International Journal of Production Economics, 2007, 110(1-2): 115-127.

Google Scholar

[16] Burnetas A, Ritchken P. Management Science, 2005, 51(4): 566-580.

Google Scholar

[17] M.Caridi,R.Cigolini, Marco D.De. Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 2006, 19(5): 465-482.

Google Scholar

[18] DJ Wu, PR Kleindorfer. Management Science, 2005, 51(3): 452-466.

Google Scholar

[19] SP Sarmah,D Acharya, SK Goyal. European Journal of Operational Research, 2007, 182(3): 1469-1478.

Google Scholar

[20] SP Sarmah,D Acharya, SK Goyal. International Journal of Production Economics, 2008, 111(2): 676-685.

Google Scholar