Analysis of Product Family Design Chain Using Strategy-Engineering Perspective

Article Preview

Abstract:

Product family is widely used in the modern manufacture enterprise to alleviate the cost pressure taken from differential customer needs. The quality of product family design determines the ability of a company to gain competitive advantage. The presented work for product family design focus on engineering design field, and the influence from the enterprise strategy is ignored. Using value chain analysis as a tool, the concept of product family design chain could be formed by taking the strategic elements into product family development process. Design chain can be examined from three domains, namely strategy analysis, preliminary design and scheme optimization. The competition advantage of enterprise comes from the excellence in the each link of design chain. Through a series of concurrent engineering, product platform design bring the cost advantage, and the customization design realized the ascension of customer satisfaction.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 482-484)

Pages:

2355-2359

Citation:

Online since:

February 2012

Authors:

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2012 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] X.H. Du, J.X. Jiao, and M.M. Tseng: Concurrent Engineering: Research and Application Vol. 9 (2001), p.309

Google Scholar

[2] P. Tarasewich, S.K. Nair: IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management Vol. 48 (2001), p.175

Google Scholar

[3] T.W. Simpson: AI EDAM Vol. 18 (2004), p.3

Google Scholar

[4] D. Kumar, W. Chen and T.W. Simpson: International Journal of Production Research Vol. 47 (2009), p.71

Google Scholar

[5] J.X. Jiao, T.W. Simpson and Z. Siddique: J. Intell. Manuf. Vol. 18 (2007), p.5

Google Scholar

[6] Z. Siddique, D.W. Rosen: AI EDAM Vol. 15 (2001), p.91

Google Scholar

[7] R. Cooper, A.B. Wootton and M. Bruce: Technovation Vol. 18 (1998), p.497

Google Scholar

[8] C.D. Rosso: The Journal of Systems and Software Vol. 81 (2008), p.1

Google Scholar

[9] J.S. Yu, J.P. Gonzalez-Zugasti and K.N. Otto: J. Mech. Des. Vol. 121 (1999), p.329

Google Scholar

[10] K. Ulrich: Research Policy Vol. 24 (1995), p.419

Google Scholar

[11] W.L. Moore, J.J. Louviere and R. Verma: Journal of Product Innovation Management Vol. 16 (1999), p.27

Google Scholar

[12] R. Sanchez, J.T. Mahoney: Strategic Management Journal Vol. 17 (1996), p.63

Google Scholar

[13] F. Erens, K. Verhulst: Computers in Industry Vol. 33 (1997), p.165

Google Scholar

[14] M.M. Tseng, X.H. Du: CIRP Annals - Manufacturing Technology Vol. 47 (1998), p.103

Google Scholar

[15] J. Barney: Journal of Management Vol. 17 (1991), p.99

Google Scholar

[16] E.J. Flynn, B.B. Flynn: Journal of Managerial Issues Vol. 8 (1996), p.360

Google Scholar

[17] M.A. Schilling, H.K. Steensma: Academy of Management Journal Vol. 44 (2001), p.1149

Google Scholar