Minimum Fluidization Velocity of Binary Particles with Different Geldart Classification

Article Preview

Abstract:

The minimum fluidization behavior of four different binary particle systems with different Geldart classification is experimentally investigated by carrying out slow defluidization of an experimental cold device of I.D. 300 mm and height 3 m. The solid particles are four kinds of quartz sand particles with equal density, corresponding to Group A, B, C and D particles of Geldart classification, respectively. The fluidization processes can be divided into packing state, partial fluidization state and complete fluidization state. The difference in physical properties and mass fraction of the two constituent solid phases is found to strongly influence the fluidization behavior and the minimum fluidization velocity during the slow defluidization process. For binary particle systems, the minimum fluidization velocity decreases with increasing mass fraction of the component whose fluidization quality is better. Finally, the models of Noda et al. (1986), Cheung et al. (1974) and Chiba et al. (1979) are used to predict the minimum fluidization velocity of above binary particle systems.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 482-484)

Pages:

655-662

Citation:

Online since:

February 2012

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2012 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] P. Ammendola, R. Chirone and F. Raganati: Adv. Powder Technol. Vol. 22 (2011), pp.174-183

Google Scholar

[2] R. D.Felice and C. Scapinello: Chem. Eng. Sci. Vol. 65 (2010), pp.5187-5192

Google Scholar

[3] M. Asif and A. A. Ibrahim: Powder Technol. Vol. 126 (2002), pp.241-254

Google Scholar

[4] K. L. Clarke, T. Pugsley and G. A. Hill: Chem. Eng. Sci. Vol. 60 (2005), pp.6909-6918

Google Scholar

[5] D. C. Sau, S. Mohanty and K. C. Biswal: Powder Technol. Vol. 186 (2008), pp.241-246

Google Scholar

[6] D. C. Sau, S. Mohanty and K. C. Biswal: Chem. Eng. and Process. Vol. 47 (2008), pp.2386-2390

Google Scholar

[7] N. Nakagawa, R. Suzuki, K. Toda, et al.: J. Chem. Eng. Japan. Vol. 35 (2002), pp.595-603

Google Scholar

[8] W. R. A. Goosen, G. L. Dumont and G. L. Spaepen: Chem. Eng. Program Symp. Vol. 67 (1971), pp.38-45

Google Scholar

[9] C. Y. Wen and Y. H. Yu: Chem. Eng. symp. Seri. Vol. 62 (1966), pp.100-111

Google Scholar

[10] L. Cheung, A .W. Nienow and P. N. Rowe: Chem. Eng. Sci. Vol. 29 (1974), pp.1301-1303

Google Scholar

[11] S. Chiba, T. Chiba and A.W. Nienow: Powder Technol. Vol. 22 (1979), pp.255-269

Google Scholar

[12] K. Noda, S. Uchida, T. Makino, et al: Powder Technol. Vol. 46 (1986), pp.149-154

Google Scholar

[13] S. Ergun: Chem. Eng. Program, Vol. 48 (1952), pp.89-94

Google Scholar