For Libraries For Publication Open Access Downloads About Us Contact Us
Paper Titles
Physical, Mechanical, and Thermal Properties of Sisal Cellulose Biocomposite Films
p.1016
Bio-Modelling Using Rapid Prototyping by Fused Deposition
p.1021
ZMP Based Gait Generation of AIT Leg Exoskeleton-A Further Gaits Generation
p.1026
Using Modeling and Simulation in the Manufacturing of Medical Devices
p.1032
SCOR Based Food Supply Chain’s Sustainable Performance Evaluation Model
p.1039
A Cheap Synthetic Route to Commercial Ruthenium N3 Dye for Sensitizing Solar Cell Applications
p.1049
Experimental Study on Performance of Vertical Axis Wind Turbine with NACA 4-Digital Series of Blades
p.1055
Exploration on Infiltrating the Sense of Green Chemistry in University Teaching of Organic Chemistry
p.1062
The Used of Pineapple Leaf Fiber, Banana Stem and Kenaf for Production of Paper
p.1066

SCOR Based Food Supply Chain’s Sustainable Performance Evaluation Model

Article Preview

Abstract:

This paper introduces a first level of the SCOR based Food Supply Chain’s Sustainable Performance Evaluation Model and a case study. The model connects environmental performance to the part of the supply chain performance. The aim of the model is to consider ecologic issues as a part of the strategic supply chain decisions and in that way to develop supply chain management more sustainable. The food supply chain’s sustainable performance model consists of the ecological, social, and environmental metrics. It bases e.g. on the level 1 SCOR-metrics. The developed method is used in the case study as a method. The results of the case study shows e.g. that if one production plant would be replaced with two plants the delivery time and delivery costs, waste and carbon dioxide emissions would decrease and production costs and investment costs would increase. The results of the case study show that individual measures of the environmental or economical performance are not enough when optimizing supply chains sustainable performance. Also optimizing production cost or delivery performance may differ from supply chain overall performance. More holistic way to measure overall sustainable performance are needed. The sustainable performance evaluation model seems to be useful way to improve sustainable supply chain management but more studies are needed.

You might also be interested in these eBooks
Key Engineering Materials II View Preview

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 488-489)

Pages:

1039-1045

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.488-489.1039

Citation:

Cite this paper

Online since:

March 2012

Authors:

Hanne Kyllönen, Petri Helo

Keywords:

Strategic Decision Making, Supply Chain Management, Sustainable Performance

Export:

RIS, BibTeX

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Request Permissions

Permissions PLS:

Request Permissions

Сopyright:

© 2012 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

References

[1] Zhou H, Benton W, Schilling D, Milligan G. Supply Chain Integration and the SCOR Model. Journal Of Business Logistics [serial online]. December 2011;32(4):332-344. Available from: Business Source Elite, Ipswich, MA.

DOI: 10.1111/j.0000-0000.2011.01029.x

Google Scholar

[2] Bolstorff, Peter & Rosenbaum, Robert. 2003. Supply Chain Excellence: A Handbook for Dramatic Improvement Using the SCOR Model. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 39(4), 38.

Google Scholar

[3] Supply-Chain Council, 2009. Supply Chain Operations Reference Model Version 8.0

Google Scholar

[4] Gunasekaran, Angappa; Lai, Kee-hung & Cheng, T C Edwin 2008. Responsive supply chain: A competitive strategy in a networked economy. Omega, 36(4), 549.

DOI: 10.1016/j.omega.2006.12.002

Google Scholar

[5] Gunasekaran, A; Patel, C., & McGaughey, Ronald E. 2004. A framework for supply chain performance measurement. International Journal of Production Economics, 87(3), 333-347.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2003.08.003

Google Scholar

[6] Gunasekaran, Angappa & Kobu, Bulent. 2007. Performance measures and metrics in logistics and supply chain management: a review of recent literature (1995-2004) for research and applications. International Journal of Production Research, 45(12), 2819.

DOI: 10.1080/00207540600806513

Google Scholar

[7] Giannakis, M. 2007. Performance measurement of supplier relationships. Supply Chain Managem., 12(6), 400-411.

DOI: 10.1108/13598540710826335

Google Scholar

[8] Ritchie, B & Brindley, C. 2007. An emergent framework for supply chain risk management and performance measurement. The Journal of the Operational Research Society: Risk Based Methods for Supply Chain Planning and Management, 58(11), 1398-1411.

DOI: 10.1057/palgrave.jors.2602412

Google Scholar

[9] Gaiardelli, Paolo; Saccani, Nicola & Songini, Lucrezia. 2007. Performance measurement of the after-sales service network-Evidence from the automotive industry. Computers in Industry, 58(7), 698.

DOI: 10.1016/j.compind.2007.05.008

Google Scholar

[10] Jeong, Jung Sik & Hong, Paul. 2007. Customer orientation and performance outcomes in supply chain management. Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 20(5), 578-594.

DOI: 10.1108/17410390710823707

Google Scholar

[11] Seeking modern financial tools. 2009. Industrial Engineer, May 1, 14. http://www.proquest.com/ (accessed August 4, 2009).

Google Scholar

[12] Berrah, Lamia & Clivillé, Vincent 2007. Towards an aggregation performance measurement system model in a supply chain context. Computers in Industry, 58(7), 709.

DOI: 10.1016/j.compind.2007.05.012

Google Scholar

[13] Hutchison, P., M. Farris, and G. Fleischman. 2009. Supply Chain Cash-to-Cash: A Strategy for the 21st century. Strategic Finance 91, no. 1, (July 1): 41-48. http://www.proquest.com/ (accessed August 4, 2009).

Google Scholar

[14] Elkington J. 1997. Cannibals with forks. The triple bottom line of the 21th century business. Oxford: Captone Publishing Limited. 402 pg.

Google Scholar

[15] Forsman- Hugg, S.; Paananen, J.; Isoniemi, M.; Pesonen, I.; Mäkelä, J; Jakouo, K. & Kurppa S. Laatu- ja vastuunäkemyksiä elintarvikeketjussa. 123 pg. http://www.mtt.fi/met/pdf/met83.pdf

DOI: 10.33354/smst.76103

Google Scholar

[16] Wiedmann, T., M. Lenzen, and J. Barrett. 2009. Companies on the Scale: Comparing and Benchmarking the Sustainability Performance of Businesses. Journal of Industrial Ecology 13, no. 3, (June 1): 361. http://www.proquest.com/ (accessed August 10, 2009).

DOI: 10.1111/j.1530-9290.2009.00125.x

Google Scholar

[17] Ganesan, S., George, M., Jap, S., Palmatier, R., & Weitz, B.. 2009. Supply Chain Management and Retailer Performance: Emerging Trends, Issues, and Implications for Research and Practice. Journal of Retailing: Enhancing the Retail Customer Experience, 85(1), 84-94. Retrieved August 4, 2009, from ABI/INFORM Global. (Document ID: 1661447601).

DOI: 10.1016/j.jretai.2008.12.001

Google Scholar

[18] Jamali, D.  2006. Insights into triple bottom line integration from a learning organization perspective. Business Process Management Journal 12, no. 6, (November 1): 809.  http://www.proquest.com

DOI: 10.1108/14637150610710945

Google Scholar

[19] Kleine A, Hauff M. Sustainability-Driven Implementation of Corporate Social Responsibility: Application of the Integrative Sustainability Triangle. Journal Of Business Ethics [serial online]. April 17, 2009;85:517-533. Available from: Business Source Elite, Ipswich, MA. Accessed January 12, 2012.

DOI: 10.1007/s10551-009-0212-z

Google Scholar

[20] Carter C, Rogers D. A framework of sustainable supply chain management: moving toward new theory. International Journal Of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management [serial online]. June 2008;38(5):360-387. Available from: Business Source Elite, Ipswich, MA. Accessed January 12, 2012.

DOI: 10.1108/09600030810882816

Google Scholar

[21] World Resource Institute. 2011. Product Life Cycle Accounting and Reporting Standard http://www.wbcsd.org/Pages/Adm/Download.aspx?ID=6081&ObjectTypeId=7. Cited November 20, (2011)

Google Scholar

[22] Pankaj B, Cummis C., Rich D., Draucker L., Lahd H, & Brown A. WRI 2011, Greenhouse Gas Protocol Corporate Value Chain (Scope 3) Accounting and Reporting Standard.

Google Scholar

[23] ISO 2010, www.iso.org

Google Scholar

[24] Green House Gas Protocol. 2011. Corporate Standard. http://www.ghgprotocol.org/standards/product-standard.

Google Scholar

[25] Doherty S., Hoyle, S. & X. Veillard 2010. Consignment – Level Carbon Reporting, Background to Guidelines. World Economic Forum, Geneve, Switzerland.

Google Scholar

[26] Faldu, Tejas & Krishna, Srikanth. 2007. Supply Chain Metrics That Measure Up. Supply & Demand Chain Executive, 8(3), 50, 52-53.

Google Scholar

[27] VTT. Liikenteen päästöt. Lipasto, 2011. Järjestelmän esittely. http://lipasto.vtt.fi/index.htm.

Google Scholar

[28] Katajajuuri, Juha-Matti; Grönroos, Juha; Usva, Kirsi; Virtanen, Yrjö; Sipilä, Ilkka; Venäläinen, Eija; Kurppa, Sirpa; Tanskanen, Riitta; Mattila, Tuomas & Virtanen, Hanna (2006). Broilerin filesuikaleiden ympäristövaikutukset ja kehittämismahdollisuudet. MTT.

DOI: 10.33354/smst.75856

Google Scholar

© 2025 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All rights are reserved, including those for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies. For open access content, terms of the Creative Commons licensing CC-BY are applied.
Scientific.Net is a registered trademark of Trans Tech Publications Ltd.