Effect of Process Parameters in Electric Discharge Machining of Ti-6Al–4V Alloy by Three Different Tool Electrode Materials

Article Preview

Abstract:

The effect of process parameters namely peak current, pulse on time and flushing pressure on electrical discharge machining (EDM) of titanium alloy (Ti–6Al–4V) were investigated by using three different tool electrode materials namely copper, brass, and aluminium. Kerosene is used as dielectric. The process parameters for machining Ti6Al4V are varied at three levels by using Taguchi's orthogonal array table. The responses such as Metal Removal Rate (MRR), Tool Wear Rate (TWR), and Surface Roughness (SR) are measured and the most significant parameter was confirmed by ANOVA (Analysis Of Variance). The test result shows that copper electrode material possesses higher MRR, less TWR as compared to brass and aluminium. Brass and copper tools has good surface finish as compared with aluminium. The finest electrode material for machining of Ti6Al4V alpha beta alloy in EDM process was in the order of copper, brass and aluminium.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 488-489)

Pages:

876-880

Citation:

Online since:

March 2012

Keywords:

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2012 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] ASM Handbook, Properties and Selection: Nonferrous Alloys and Special Purpose Materials, vol. 2, (2001).

Google Scholar

[2] E.O. Ezugwu, Z.M. Wang: J. Mater. Process. Technol. 68 (1997), p.262.

Google Scholar

[3] R. R Boyer: Material science and Engineering A. 213 (1996), p.103.

Google Scholar

[4] Mitsuo Niinomi: Sci. and Tech. of Advanced Materials, Vol. 4 Issue 5 (2003), p.445.

Google Scholar

[5] Chen, S.L., Yan, B.H., and Huang, F.Y.: J. of Mat. Proc. Tech. 87 (1999), p.107.

Google Scholar

[6] AhmetHascalık, Ulas C¸ aydas: Applied Surface Science 253 (2007), p.9007.

Google Scholar

[7] J. Y. Kao & C. C. Tsao & S. S. Wang & C. Y. Hsu: Int J Adv Manuf. Tech. (2010) 47, p.395.

Google Scholar

[8] S.L. Chen, B.H. Yan , F.Y. Huang: . of Mat. Proc. Tech. 87 (1999), p.107.

Google Scholar

[9] ChinmayaR. Dandek, YungC. Shin , JohnBarnes: Inter. J of M/c Tools &Manuf. 50 (2010)p.174.

Google Scholar

[10] Peter Fonda, Zhigang Wang, Kazuo Yamazaki, Yuji Akutsu: J. of Mat. Proc. Tech 202, Issues 1-3, 20 (2008), p.583.

Google Scholar

[11] C.H.C. Haron, A. Jawaid: J. of Mat. Proc. Tech. 166 (2005), p.188.

Google Scholar

[12] Bernd M. Schumacher: J. of Mat. Proc. Tech 149 (2004) p.376.

Google Scholar

[13] AnandPandey , Shankar Singh: Inter. J Engg. Sci. & Tech. 2 (2010), p . 2172.

Google Scholar

[14] K.H. Ho, S.T. Newman: Inter. J Machine Tools & Manuf. 43 (2003), p.1287.

Google Scholar

[15] M.A. Norliana, D.G. Solomon, Md.F. Bahari: Int. J. Machine Tools Manf. 47 (2007) p.1214.

Google Scholar

[16] Shankar Singh, S. Maheshwari, P.C. Pandey:. J. of Mat. Proc. Tech 149 (2004), p.272.

Google Scholar