Milling Strategies for Thin-Walled Components

Article Preview

Abstract:

Recent developments in the Aerospace industry have led to thin-walled, reduced-weight engine designs. Due to demands in manufacturing, production speeds and material removal rates (MRR) have increased. As component wall thickness gets thinner, the consequence oftentimes is an increase in chatter vibrations. This paper suggests that a correctly chosen tool-to-workpiece offset geometry may lead to a robust and chatter-free process. The results show the differences in force response for three geometries while varying the overhang of the workpiece. This is part of a concerted effort to develop a robust methodology for the prediction of chatter vibrations during milling operations of thin-walled Aerospace components. This paper outlines certain robust machining practices. It also analyzes the criticality of the choice of offset between tool and workpiece during milling setup as well as the effects that the entry and exit of cut have on system vibrations.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

177-182

Citation:

Online since:

April 2012

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2012 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Y. Altintas and E. Budak: Annals of the CIRP Vol. 44(1) (1995), pp.357-362.

Google Scholar

[2] S. Smith and J. Tlusty: Annals of the CIRP 42(1) (1993), pp.463-466.

Google Scholar

[3] S.A. Tobias and W. Fishwick: A Theory of Regenerative Chatter (The Engineer, London 1958).

Google Scholar

[4] F. Koenigsberger and J. Tlusty: Machine Tool Structures Vol. 1: Stability Against Chatter (Pergamon Press, 1967).

Google Scholar

[5] I. Minis, T. Yanushevsky, R. Tembo and R. Hocken: Annals of the CIRP Vol 39 (1990), pp.459-462.

DOI: 10.1016/s0007-8506(07)61096-8

Google Scholar

[6] R. Shridhar, R.E. Hohn and G.W. Long: J. of Eng. for Ind. Vol. 90 (1968), pp.330-334.

Google Scholar

[7] E. Budak and Y. Altintas: J. of Dyn. Sys., Meas. and Control Vol. 120 (1998), pp.31-36.

Google Scholar

[8] E. Budak and Y. Altintas: J. of Dyn. Sys., Meas. and Control Vol. 120 (1998), pp.22-30.

Google Scholar

[9] J. Tlusty and F. Ismail: Annals of the CIRP Vol. 30(1) (1981), pp.299-304.

Google Scholar

[10] S.A. Tobias: Machine Tool Vibration (Blackie and Sons Ltd., 1965).

Google Scholar

[11] L. Arnaud, O. Gonzalo, S. Seguy, H. Jauregi and G. Peigue: Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. (2010).

Google Scholar

[12] G. Quintana and J. Ciurana: Int. J. of Mach. Tools and Manuf. Vol. 51 (5) (2011), p.363–376.

Google Scholar