Economic Feasibility and Comprehensive Evaluation Model Analysis on Solid-Catalyzed Bio-Diesel Production

Article Preview

Abstract:

Considerable attention has been given to bio-diesel as a surrogate to fossil fuel reserves and associated environmental problems of burning them. However, the high costs of bio-diesel production remain the main problem in making it competitive. Bio-diesel and glycerol are obtained by reacting virgin vegetable oil or animal fat with an alcohol in the presence of a catalyst or non-catalyst via transesterification. A conceptual process of heterogeneous SnO-catalyzed transesterification is designed based on the condition of 333K and atmospheric pressure, using methanol and waste oil with a molar ratio of 10:1 as raw materials. In this paper, the economic feasibility analysis based on static payback time, dynamic investment payback period, Financial Net Present Value and Return on Investment, is elaborated for 10kton/y capacity transesterification units. Comprehensive evaluation model on four typical methods are done, taking the following factors into consideration including natural resource utilization, impact on environment, economic feasibility and sustainable development of society. As a result, Heterogeneous acid-catalyzed transesterification seems more transcendent.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 512-515)

Pages:

515-519

Citation:

Online since:

May 2012

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2012 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] J. M. Marchetti, V. U. Miguel and A. F. Errazu: Renewable and Sustainable Energy. Vol. 11 (2007), p.1300

Google Scholar

[2] F. R. Ma and M. A. Hanna: Bioresources Technology. Vol. 70 (1999), p.1

Google Scholar

[3] N. N. A. N. Yusuf, S. K. Kamarudin and Z. Yaakub: Energy Conversion and Management. Vol. 52 (2011), p.2741

Google Scholar

[4] S. H. Shuit, Y. T. Ong, K. T. Lee, B. Subhash and S. H. Tan: submitted to Biotechnology Advances (2012).

Google Scholar

[5] A. Demirbas: Energy Conversion and Management. Vol. 50 (2009), p.14

Google Scholar

[6] S. P. Singh and D. Singh: Renewable and Sustainable Energy. Vol. 14 (2010), p.200

Google Scholar

[7] R. G. Nelson: Biomass and Bioenergy. Vol. 22 (2002), p.349

Google Scholar

[8] Y. Zhang: Bioresources Technology. Vol. 89 (2003), p.1

Google Scholar

[9] Y. Zhang, M. A. Dubé, D. D. McLean and M. Kates: Bioresources Technology. Vol. 90 (2003), p.229

Google Scholar

[10] D. Narayanan, Y. Zhang and M. S. Mannan: Process Safety and Environmental Protection. Vol. 85 (2007), p.349

Google Scholar

[11] J. M. Marchetti, V. U. Miguel and A. F. Errazu: Fuel Processing Technology. Vol. 89 (2008), p.740

Google Scholar

[12] U. Rashid, F. Anwar, B. R. Moser and S. Ashraf: Biomass and Bioenergy. Vol. 32 (2008), p.1202

Google Scholar

[13] D. R. Fernandes, N. Rosenbach and C. J. A. Mota: Applied Catalysis A. Vol. 367 (2009), p.108

Google Scholar

[14] Z. Helwani, M. R. Othman, N. Aziz, J. Kim and W. J. N. Fernando: Applied Catalysis A. Vol. 363 (2009), p.1

Google Scholar

[15] X. Miao, R. Li and H. Yao: Energy Conversion and Management. Vol. 50 (2009), p.2680

Google Scholar

[16] W. Xie and D. Yang: Bioresources Technology. Vol. 102 (2011), p.9818

Google Scholar

[17] F. R. Abreu, M. B. Alves, C. C. S. Macêdo, L. F. Zara and P. A. Z. Suarez: Journal of Molecular Catalysis A: Chemical. Vol. 227 (2005), p.263

Google Scholar

[18] M. J. Schniederjans and T. Garvin: European Journal of Operational Research. Vol. 100 (1997), p.72

Google Scholar

[19] R. R. Levary and K. Wan: European Journal of Operational Research. Vol. 106 (1998), p.116

Google Scholar

[20] L. Bodin and S. I. Gass: Computers and Operations Research. Vol. 30 (2003), p.1487

Google Scholar

[21] A. Ishizaka and A. Labib: Expert Systems with Applications. Vol. 38 (2011), p.7317

Google Scholar