A System Dynamic Model for the Environmental Performance Index of Malaysia

Abstract:

The Third Principle which is pertaining to the right to development in Agenda 21 of the Rio Declaration or Earth Summit asserts that it must be fulfilled so that development must be sustainable which has been defined as development that meets the needs of the present without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own need. Among the various models of environmental sustainability comparative studies was the Environmental Performance Index (EPI) model. Malaysia was ranked 54 recording a score of 65 and ranked 10 among the Asia and Pacific Countries behind two ASEAN countries: Singapore and Philippines. The environmental indicators from 2010 EPI was therefore used to develop the System Dynamics Simulation Model to provide the framework and procedure for qualitative and quantitative description, exploration and analysis of the systems in terms of their processes, information boundaries and strategies, facilitating quantitative simulation modeling for policy evaluation and predictions pertinent to sustainability. The System Dynamic Simulation Model developed for the EPI of Malaysia changed the static presentation to a dynamic scenario. Two very important components were considered: the contribution and the impact of population and the industrial activities indicated as the Industrial Productivity Index. The simulated EPI of 66.51 was shown to differ slightly from the EPI 2010 of 65 attributed to the inclusion of the population and the industrial production factors in the system dynamic model, in which the later study did not compute the EPI with respect to the two factors. Thus, the System Dynamic Simulation Model developed has shown to be reliable and be used for any country to simulate EPI for future trends.

• Periodical: Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 518-523)
• Pages: 1062-1071
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.518-523.1062
• Online since: May 2012
• Authors: Margaret Chan Kit Yok, Yap Bee Wah, Ting Siew King, Wong Mui Hung, Elly Lawai
• Keywords: Ecosystem Vitality, Environmental Health, Environmental Performance Index, System Dynamic Model

References

[1] I.S. Held, and B.J. Soden: Water Vapor Feedback and Global Warming. Annual Review of Energy and the Environment Vol. 25: 441-475 (2000).

DOI: 10.1146/annurev.energy.25.1.441

[2] B. Shmaefsky: Favorite Demonstrations for College Science: an NSTA Press journals collection. NSTA Press. p.57 (2004).

[3] WECD: Our common future: Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development. UN Documents: Gathering a Body of Global Agreements (1987).

[4] United Nation: United Nation Sustainable Development: Agenda 21. United Nations Conference on Environment & Development Rio de Janerio, Brazil, 3 to 14 June 1992. Information on http: from http://www.un.org/esa/sustdev/agenda21.htm. (1992)

DOI: 10.1017/s0376892900031647

[5] M. Wackernagel and W.E. Rees: Our Ecological Footprint: Reducing Human Impact on the Earth. New Society Publishers. 160 p. (1996).

[6] B. Molden, B and A.L. Dahl: Challenges to Sustainability Indicators. In Hak, T., Molden, B and Dahl, A.L. ed. Sustainability Indicators, SCOPE 67. Island Press, London.1 – 24 (227).

[7] D.L. Johnson, S..H. Ambrose, T.J. Bassett, M.L. Bowen, D.E. Crummey, J.S. Isaacson, D.N. Johnson, P. Lamb, M. Saul, and A.E. Winter-Nelson.. Meanings of Environmental Terms. Journal of Environmental Quality 26: 581-589 (1997).

DOI: 10.2134/jeq1997.00472425002600030002x

[8] R. Jha and K.V.B. Murthy: An inverse global environmental Kuznets curve. Journal of Comparative Economics 31: 352–368 (2003).

DOI: 10.1016/s0147-5967(03)00042-8

[9] D.C. Esty, M. Levy, T Srebotnjak, and A. de Sherbinin: 2005 Environmental Sustainability Index: Benchmarking National Environmental Stewardship. New Haven: Yale Center for Environmental Law & Policy (2005).

[10] J. Emerson, D.C. Esty, C. Kim, T. Srebotnjak, M.A. Levy, V. Mara, A. de Sherbinin and M. Jaiteh: 2010 Environmental Performance Index. Yale Center for Environmental Law & Policy. Environmental Performance Index (2010).

[11] J.A. M. Vennix: Group Model Building. Facilitating Team Learning Using System Dynamics. Wiley, Chichester. (1996).

DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1099-1379(199803)19:2<215::aid-job893>3.0.co;2-p

[12] N Roberts, D.F. Andersen, R.M. Deal, M.S. Grant and W.A. Schaffer: Introduction to Computer Simulation: The Systems Dynamics Modeling Approach, Addision-Wesley, Reading, MA. (1983).

[13] Ventana Systems Inc. VENSIM, Ventana Simulation Environment Reference Manual (1994).

[14] J. Martínez-Fernández, M.A. Esteve-Selma and J.F. Calvo-Sendín: Environmental and Socioeconomic Interactions in the Evolution of traditional Irrigated Lands: A dynamic System Model. Human ecology, Vol. 28 (2): 279–299 (2000).

DOI: 10.1023/a:1007024204961

[15] World Health Organization: Public Health and the Environment for Malaysia,Geneva (2009).