Recovery Dynamics of Vegetation and Soil Properties in Karst Rocky Desertification Areas in Guizhou, China

Article Preview

Abstract:

Abstract. Dynamics of vegetation and soil properties responses to vegetation recovery in the selected 72 Karst desertification sites in Guizhou, China were studied. Six typical and representative vegetation types along a chronosequence of vegetation recovery (corn land, sparse grass, regeneration forest, shrub, grass and shrub, and native forest with 0, 3-5, 10-15, 20-30, 30-40, and >100 yrs, respectively) were selected for the study of the plant species, vegetation features as well as soil physical & chemical properties in order to assess interaction between soil properties and vegetation structure. It was found that vegetation species had dry-resistant characteristics because of their extensive exposure to the basement rocks and thinness soil. Grass community was always coarse grass, shrub was generally dominated by vines, thorn bushes and tree species were almost leather-like, single and mini-type leaf plants. Factor analysis showed that the 3 factors, soil fertility, pH and clay, explain 67.97 % of total variance among the 19 soil property parameters. Soil fertility changed significantly effects included the increasing of soil organic matter, total and available nitrogen, humic acid, CEC, fuvic acid, exchange Ca, porosity and total P but decreasing bulk density. This trend was followed by enhancing of bio-enrichment capacity along the chronosequence of vegetation recovering process. Soil pH had no significant correlation with the vegetation recovery stages because it was determined by soil forming process and characteristic of parent materials. The factor clay only decreased slightly in the recovery stages. Cluster analysis indicated that vegetation structure could develop within short time under anthropocentric interfering, but soil fertility only accumulated with annual litter decomposing. We can conclude that recovery of vegetation community structure proceeded restoration of soil function.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 518-523)

Pages:

4532-4544

Citation:

Online since:

May 2012

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2012 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Bao, S. D. 2000. Methods of Soil Agrochemical Analysis. China Agriculture Press (in Chinese). Bejing, p.10--96.

Google Scholar

[2] Celik, I. 2005. Land-use effects on organic matter and physical properties of soil in a southern Mediterranean highland of Turkey. Soil Till. Res. 83: 270--277.

DOI: 10.1016/j.still.2004.08.001

Google Scholar

[3] Chen, Q. W., Xiong, K. N. and Lan, A. J. 2007. Analysis on karst rocky desertification in Guizhou based on"3S". Carsolo. Sinica (In Chinese). 26: 37--42.

Google Scholar

[4] Dana, E. D. and Mota, J. F. 2006. Vegetation and soil recovery on gypsum outcrops in semi-arid Spain. J. Arid Environ. 65: 444--459.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jaridenv.2005.08.009

Google Scholar

[5] Evrendileka, F., Celikb, I. and Kilicc, S. 2004. Changes in soil organic carbon and other physical soil properties along adjacent Mediterranean forest, grassland, and cropland ecosystems in Turkey. J. Arid Environ. 59: 743--752.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jaridenv.2004.03.002

Google Scholar

[6] Huang, Q. H. and Cai, Y. L. 2006. Assessment of karst rocky desertification using the radial basis function network model and GIS techcique: a case study of Guizhou Province, China. Environ. Geol. 49: 1173--1179.

DOI: 10.1007/s00254-005-0162-4

Google Scholar

[7] Jiang, Y. J. 2006. The impact of land-use on soil properties in a karst agricultural region of Southwest China: a case study of Xiaojiang watershed, Yunnan. J Geo Sci. 16: 69--77.

DOI: 10.1007/s11442-006-0107-1

Google Scholar

[8] Lemenih, M., Karltun, E. and Olsson, M. 2005. Assessing soil chemical and physical property responses to deforestation and subsequent cultivation in smallholders farming system in Ethiopia. Agriculture, Ecosyst. Environ. 105: 373--386.

DOI: 10.1016/j.agee.2004.01.046

Google Scholar

[9] Li, Y. Y. and Shao, M. A. 2006. Change of soil physical properties under long-term natural vegetation restoration in the Loess Plateau of China. J. Arid Environ. 64: 77--96.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jaridenv.2005.04.005

Google Scholar

[10] Long, J., Huang, C.Y. and Li, J. 2002. Effects of land use on soil quality in karst hilly area. J. soil water conserv. (in Chinese). 16: 76--79.

Google Scholar

[11] Luo, H. B., Qian, X. G., Liu, F., He, T. B., Song, G. Y., 2003. Ecological Benefit of Soil and Water Conservation in Hilly Areas by De farming and Reafforestation. J. Soil Water Conserv. (in Chinese). 17, 31--34.

Google Scholar

[12] Lu, R. K. 2000. Methods of Soil Agrochemical Analysis. China Agriculture Press (in Chinese). Bejing. p.12--148.

Google Scholar

[13] McGrath,D. A., Smith, C. K., Gholz, H. L. and Oliveira, F. A. 2001. Effects of Land-Use Change on Soil Nutrient Dynamics in Amazonia. Ecosyst. 4: 625--645.

DOI: 10.1007/s10021-001-0033-0

Google Scholar

[14] Mermut, A. R. and Eswaran, H. 2001. Some major developments in soil science since the mid-1960s. Geoderma. 100: 403--426.

DOI: 10.1016/s0016-7061(01)00030-1

Google Scholar

[15] Peng, J. and Yang, M. D. 2001. On the present soil erosion situation of Huajiang karst gorge in Guizhou Province. J. Mount. Sci. (in Chinese). 19: 511--515.

Google Scholar

[16] Ritter, E., Vesterda, L. and Gundersen, P. 2003. Changes in soil properties after afforestation of former intensively managed soils with oak and Norway spruce. Plant Soil. 249: 319--330.

Google Scholar

[17] Su, Y. Z., Zhao, H. L., Zhao, W. Z. and Zhang, T. H. 2004. Fractal features of soil particle size distribution and the implication for indicating desertification. Geoderma. 122: 43--49.

DOI: 10.1016/j.geoderma.2003.12.003

Google Scholar

[18] Su, Y. Z. and Zhao, H. L. 2003. Soil properties and plant species in an age sequence of Caragana microphylla plantations in the Horqin Sandy Land, north China. Ecolo.Engineering. 20: 223--235.

DOI: 10.1016/s0925-8574(03)00042-9

Google Scholar

[19] Templera, P. H., Groffman, P. M., Fleckera, A. S. and Power, A. G. 2005. Land use change and soil nutrient transformations in the Los Haitises region of the Dominican Republic. Soil Biol. Biochem. 37: 215--225.

DOI: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2004.07.031

Google Scholar

[20] Wall, A. and Hytonen, J. 2005. Soil fertility of afforested arable land compared to continuously forested sites. Plant Soil. 275: 247--260.

DOI: 10.1007/s11104-005-1869-4

Google Scholar

[21] Wan, J., Cai, Y. L., Lu, Y. G. and He, G. 2003. Soil Erosion risk assessment in karst area: Case study in Guanling County of Guizhou Province. Res. Soil Water Conserv. (in Chinese). 10: 148--152.

Google Scholar

[22] Wang, D. L., Zhu, S. Q. and Huang, B. L. 2003. Primary study on soil physical and chemical properties in rocky desertification process. J Mount. Agri. Biol. (in Chinese). 22: 204--207.

Google Scholar

[23] Wang, D. L., Zhu, S. Q. and Huang, B. L. 2005. A study on forming process and stages of karst rocky desertification. J. Nanjing Fores. Univ. (Natural Science Edition) (in Chinese). 29: 103--106.

Google Scholar

[24] Wang, G. P., Zhai, Z. L. and Liu, J. S. 2008. Forms and profile distribution of soil phosphorus in four wetlands across gradients of sand desertification in Northeast China. Geoderma. 145: 50--59.

DOI: 10.1016/j.geoderma.2008.02.004

Google Scholar

[25] Wang, S. J., Li, Y. B. and Li, R. L. 2003. Karst rocky desertification: Formation background, evolution and comprehensive taming. Quatern. Sci. (in Chinese). 23: 657--666.

Google Scholar

[26] Wang, S. J., Liu, Q. M. and Zhang, D. F. 2004. Karst rocky desertification in Southwestern China: Geomorphology, landuse, impact and rehabilitation. Land Degrad Dev. 15: 115--121.

DOI: 10.1002/ldr.592

Google Scholar

[27] Wang, X. D., Li, M. H., Liu, S. Z. and Liu, G. C. 2006. Fractal characteristics of soils under different land-use patterns in the arid and semiarid regions of the Tibetan Plateau, China. Geoderma. 134: 56--61.

DOI: 10.1016/j.geoderma.2005.08.014

Google Scholar

[28] Yang, S. T. and Zhu, Q. J. 1999. Review of the researches on soil degradation in karst environment. Carsolo. sinica (in Chinese). 18: 169--175.

Google Scholar

[29] Yao, C. H., Jiang, Z. C. and Yuan, D. X. 2001. Vegetation karst effects on the karst area of Southwest China. Acta Geosci. Sinica (in Chinese). 22: 159--164.

Google Scholar

[30] Yu, L. F., Zhu, S. Q., Zhu, X. K. and Xie, S. X. 2002. A study on evaluation of restoration and remedy technology of degraded Karst forest. Guizhou Sci. (in Chinese). 20: 7--13.

Google Scholar

[31] Zhang, M. L. and Deng, Z. Q. 1994. The soil and soil-forming processes in karst area of south China. J Guizhou Ins.Tech. (in Chinese). 23: 67--75.

Google Scholar

[32] Zhou, R. L., Li, Y. Q., Zhao, H. L. and Drake, S. 2008. Desertification effects on C and N content of sandy soils under grassland in Horqin, northern China. Geoderma. 145: 370--375.

DOI: 10.1016/j.geoderma.2008.04.003

Google Scholar

[33] Zhou, Z. F. and Huang, L. J., 2003. An analysis on relation of rock desertification to stratum and lithology in karst region. Bull.Soil Water Conserv. (in Chinese). 23: 19--22.

Google Scholar