Copper and Inhibitors Induced Changes on Subcellular Antioxidant Enzyme Activities in the Leaves of Elsholtzia haichowensis

Abstract:

Under hydroponics, shoots of the copper (Cu) accumulator Elsholtzia haichowensis after 100 μM CuSO4 treatment 6 day were additionally treated with different inhibitors, then the effects of Cu and inhibitors on antioxidant enzyme activities in leave cells of E. haichowensis were investigated. Our results showed that Cu treatment significantly increased the activities of plasma membrane–bound NADPH oxidase, apoplastic peroxidase, apoplastic superoxide dismutase (SOD), symplastic SOD and symplastic ascorbate peroxidase in leaves of E. haichowensis. When additional treatment with N-N-diethyldithiocarbamate as an inhibitor of SOD, NaN3 as an inhibitor of peroxidase, diphenyleneiodonium as an inhibitor of NADPH oxidase and1,2-dihydroxybenzene-3,5-disulphonic acid as an O2•– scavenger, the activities of Cu-induced antioxidant enzymes in leave cells of E. haichowensis were significantly inhibited. The results showed that Cu-induced increase in the activities of various antioxidant enzymes in different cell compartments may represent a defense mechanism against oxidative stress.

• Periodical: Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 518-523)
• Pages: 5539-5544
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.518-523.5539
• Online since: May 2012
• Authors: Dong Yuan
• Keywords: Antioxidant Enzyme, Copper, Elsholtzia Haichowensis, Inhibitor, Leave

References

[1] H. Marschner: Mineral Nutrition of Higher Plants (Academic Press, London, 1995).

[2] C.M. Luna, C.A. Gonzalez and V.S. Trippi: Plant Cell Physiol., Vol. 35(1994), p.11.

[3] H.D. Nielsen, C. Brownlee, S.M. Coelho and M. Brown: New Phytol., Vol. 160(2003), p.157.

[4] K. Demirevska-Kepova, L. Simova-Stoilova, Z. Stoyanova, R. Holzer and U. Feller: Environ. Exp. Bot., Vol. 52(2004), p.253.

DOI: 10.1016/j.envexpbot.2004.02.004

[5] A. Schützendübel and A. Polle: J. Exp. Bot., Vol. 53(2002), p.1351.

[6] R. Mittler:Trends Plant Sci., Vol. 7(2002), p.405.

[7] P. Chongpraditnum, S. Mori and M. Chino: Plant Cell Physiol., Vol. 33(1992), p.239.

[8] M. Gupta, A. Cuypers, J. Vangronsveld and H. Clijsters: Physiol. Plant., Vol. 106(1999), p.262.

[9] E. Morelli and G. Scarano: Plant Sci., Vol. 167(2004), p.289.

[10] L. Lombardi and L. Sebastiani: Plant Sci., Vol. 168(2005), p.797.

[11] R.K. Tewari, P. Kumar and P.N. Sharma: Planta, Vol. 223(2006), p.1145.

[12] C. Sgherri, M.F. Quartacci and F. Navari-Izzo: J. Plant Physiol., Vol. 164(2007), p.1152.

[13] H.X. Zhang, Y. Xia, G.P. Wang and Z.G. Shen: Planta, Vol. 227(2008), p.465.

[14] H.X. Zhang, F.Q. Zhang, G.P. Wang and Z.G. Shen: J Hazar. Mater., Vol. 178(2010), p.834.

[15] L.Q. Lou, Z.G. Shen and X.D. Li: Environ. Exp. Bot., Vol. 51(2004), p.111.

[16] J. Song, F.J. Zhao, Y.M. Luo, S.P. McGrath and H. Zhang: Pollut., Vol. 128(2004), p.307.

[17] M. Qian, X.D. Li and Z.G. Shen: Plant Growth Regul., Vol. 47(2005), p.65.

[18] C. Larsson, S. Widell and P. Kjellbom: Methods Enzymol., Vol. 148(1987), p.558.

[19] M.M. Bradford: Anal. Biochem., Vol. 72(1976), p.248.

[20] M. Sagi and R. Fluhr: Plant Physiol., Vol. 126(2001), p.1281.

[21] E. Vanacker, T.L.W. Carver and C.H. Foyer: Plant Physiol., Vol. 117(1998), p.1103.

[22] Y. Nakano and K. Asada: Plant Cell Physiol., Vol. 22(1981), p.867.

[23] X. Zheng and R.B. Van Huystee: Plant Sci., Vol. 81(1992), p.47.

[24] C.N. Giannopolitis and S.K. Ries: Plant Physiol., Vol. 59(1977), p.309.

[25] S.J. Neill, R. Desikan and J. Hancock: Curr. Opin. Plant Biol., Vol. 5(2002), p.388.

[26] M.C. Romero-Puertas, M. Rodriguez-Serrano, F.J. Corpas, M. Gomez, L.A. Delrio and L.M. Sandalio: Plant Cell Environ., Vol. 27(2004), p.1122.

DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-3040.2004.01217.x

[27] Y.T. Hsu and C.H. Kao: Plant Soil, Vol. 300(2007), p.137.

[28] C.M. Yeh, P.S. Chien and H.J. Huang: J. Exp. Bot., Vol. 58(2007), p.659.

[29] M.M. Fecht-Christoffers, H. Führs, H.P. Braun and W.J. Horst: Plant Physiol., Vol. 140(2006), p.1451.