Impact on the Ecological Effect for Different Spatial Resolution Image

Abstract:

In this paper, taken Landsat5/TM and SPOT5 image which was imaging in the close time as data source, the land-use map were obtained, respectively. In order to do some researches about LUCC and ecological effect, soil loss and landscape pattern metrics were selected as ecological index by corresponding counting methods. By analysis and contrast, it showed that soil loss obtained by Landsat5/TM and SPOT5 image has little difference, and the average soil erosion modulus are 181.54 t/(km2•a) and 190.17 t/(km2•a), respectively. The erosion area in different erosion classification does not appear distinct difference. By the landscape pattern metrics value, it showed that the difference of MSI, PAFRAC, CONTAG and SHDI in Landsat5/TM and SPOT5 is only between 0.07 and 0.3, and the difference of LPI and AI was higher than above 3 types of index. But in a word, there were no big difference for all the index.

• Periodical: Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 518-523)
• Pages: 5644-5647
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.518-523.5644
• Online since: May 2012
• Authors: Rong Xin Deng, Wen Juan Wang
• Keywords: Ecological Effect, Land Use/Cover Change (LUCC), SPOT5, TM

References

[1] Walker B, Steffen W. The Terrestrial Biosphere and Global Change: Implications for Natural and Managed Ecosystems. A Synthesis of CCTE and Related Research, 1997, Stockholm: ICBP, 31.

[2] Xiubin Li. Acta Geographica Sinica, 1996, 51 (5): 553 - 557. (In Chinese)

[3] Quansheng Ge, Mingcha Zhao, Jingyun Zheng. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2000, 55(6): 698 - 706. (In Chinese)

[4] Jiyuan Liu, Zengxiang Zhang, Dafang Zhuang, et al. Study on RS' Spatial-temporal Information of Land Use Change in China 1990s'[M]. Beijing: Science Press, 2005, 54-55. (In Chinese)

[5] Wischmeier W H, Smith D D. Predicting rainfall-erosion losses from cropland east of the Rocky Mountains[S]. USDA Agricultural Handbook, No.282, 1965.

[6] Arnoldus H M M. An approximation of the rainfall factor in the universal soil loss equation[A]. In: Deboodt M, Gabriels D. Assessment of erosion [M]. John Wiley and Sons, Chichester, 1980: 127 - 132.

[7] Williams J, M A Nearing, A Nicks, et a1. Jounml of Soil and Water Conservation, 1996, 51 (5): 381 - 385.

[8] Xiankui Zhang, Jinghua Xu, Xiuqin Lu, et al. Bulletin of Soil and Water Conservation, 1992, 12(4): 1-10. (In Chinese)

[9] Chongfa Cai, Shuwen Ding, Zhihua Shi, et al. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2000, 14(2):19 - 24. (In Chinese)

[10] Songcai You, Wenqing Li. Journal of Natural Resources, 1999, 14(1):62-68. (In Chinese)

[11] Jinping Guo, Hanxi Yang, Yunxiang Zhang. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 1999, 19(4): 468-473. (In Chinese)

[12] Hargis C D, Bissonette J A, David J L. Landscape Ecology, 1998, 13(3): 167-186.

[13] Rencang Bu, Yuanman Hu, Yu Chang, et al. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2005, 5(10): 2764 - 2775. (In Chinese)

[14] Riitters K H, O'Neill, Hunsaker C T, et al. Landscape Ecology, 1995, 10: 23 - 39.