Research on Physical and Chemical Properties of Different Biochars

Article Preview

Abstract:

To provide instructive information for biochar research based on utilization of agricultural residues scientifically, we investigated physical and chemical properties of different biochars. According to a registered patent method from our institute, and a simple corncob pellet kiln and relevant biochar prepare method, we chose maize straw, rice hull and corncob et al. as raw materials and measured micro-structure, element composition, specific surface area, total pore volume and average pore diameter of these materials. Results showed that biochars from all materials behaved smoothly, clear structure and average C content 60%, average ash content less than 33%. All biochars were alkaline. With high porosity, peanut hull biochar and mushroom matrix biochar tended to be designed as fertilizer carrier in agriculture. In terms of nutrients analysis, maize straw and corncob were qualified to be applied to low potassium content and low pH soil, but rice hull biochar should be used on low phosphorous content soil. There would be a wide applying spectrum of soil for rice straw biochar.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 518-523)

Pages:

807-816

Citation:

Online since:

May 2012

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2012 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Lehmann J,Gaunt J,Rondon M. Biochar sequestration in terrestrial ecosystems:A review[J]. Mitig Adapt Strat Global Change,2006 (11):403 -427.

DOI: 10.1007/s11027-005-9006-5

Google Scholar

[2] Demirbas A. Effects of temperature and particle size on bio - char yield from pyrolysis of agricultural residues[J]. Anal Appl Pyrol,2004,72:243 - 248.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jaap.2004.07.003

Google Scholar

[3] Kramer R W,Kujawinski E B,Hatcher P G. Identification of blackcarbon derived structures in a volcanic ash soil humicacid by Fourier transformion cyclotron resonance mass spectrometry[J]. Environ Sci Technol,2004,38(12):3387 - 3395.

DOI: 10.1021/es030124m

Google Scholar

[4] Gerard Cornelissen,Zofia Kukulska,Stavros Kalaitzidis. Relations between environmental black carbon sorption and geochemical sorbent characteristics[J].Environ Sci Technol,2004,38(13):3632- 3640.

DOI: 10.1021/es0498742

Google Scholar

[5] Washington J Braida,Joseph J Pignatello. Sorption hystersis of benzene in charcoal particles [J].Environ Sci Technol,2003,37(2):409 - 417.

Google Scholar

[6] Sombroek W. Amazon soils: A reconnaissance of the soils of the Brazilian Amazon region[R].Wageningen: Center for Agricultural Publications and Documentation,1966.

Google Scholar

[7] David A. Laird,Pierce Fleming,Dedrick D.Davis. Impact of biochar amendment on the quality of a typical Midwestern agricultural soil. Journal homepage:www.elseviser.com/locate/geoderma

Google Scholar

[8] X.Peng L.L.Ye,C.H. Wang,H.Zhou,B.Sun. Temperature- and duration-dependent rice straw-derived biochar:Characteristics and its effects on soil properties of an Ultisol in southern China. Journal homepage:www.elseviser.com/locate/till

DOI: 10.1016/j.still.2011.01.002

Google Scholar

[9] Jinyang Wang.Man Zhang .Zhenqing Xiong.Pingli Liu.Genxing Pan. Soil & Tillage Research 112(2011)159-166.

Google Scholar

[10] Goldberg E D. Black Carbon in the Environment:Properties and Distribution[M]. New York: John Wiley Press,1985.

Google Scholar

[11] Dongsheng Zhang, Zehui Jiang, Haiqing Ren, Xiaohong Chen. Mico-structure performance of bamboo biochar [J] Bamboo Reaearch Publication. 2006, 25 (4): 1-8.

Google Scholar

[12] NSW Government. Biochar: what are the prospects? [EB/OL]. Http://www.dpi.nsw.gov.au/_data/assets/pdf_file/0017/302264/I-and-I-NSW-Biochar. pdf.

Google Scholar

[13] Gaskin J W, Steiner C, Harris K, et al. Effect of low-temperature pyrolysis conditions on biochar for agricultural use[J].Transactions of American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers,2008, 51(6):2061-2069.

DOI: 10.13031/2013.25409

Google Scholar

[14] Antal M J, Gronli M. The art, science, and technology of charcoal production[J].Industrial & Engineering Chemistr Research,2003,42(8):1619-1640.

Google Scholar

[15] Gheorghe C, Marculescu C, Badea A, et al. Effect of pyrolysis conditions on bio-char production from biomass[C]. Proceedings of the 3rd WSEAS Int. Conf. on Renewable Energy Sources. University of La Laguna, Tenerife, Canary Islands Spain,2009:239-241.

Google Scholar

[16] Laird D A, Brown R C, Amonette J E, et al. Review of the pyrolysis platform for coproducing biooil and biochar[J]. Biofuels, Bioproducts & Biorefining,2009,3:547-562.

DOI: 10.1002/bbb.169

Google Scholar

[17] Granatstein D, Kruger C, Garcia-Perez M, et al. Biochar and pyrolysis: renewable soil carbon and energy[J].Sustaining the Pacific Northwest, Food, Farm, & Natural Resource Systems,2009,7(4):1-4.

Google Scholar

[18] Zwieten L Van, Kimber S, Morris S, et al. Effects of biochar from slow pyrolysis of papermill waste on agronomic performance and soil fertility[J].Plant and Soil,2010,327:235-246.

DOI: 10.1007/s11104-009-0050-x

Google Scholar

[19] KWON S, PIGNATELLO J J. Effects of natural organic substances on the surface and adsorptive properties of environmental black carbon(char): pseudo pore blockage by model lipid components and its implications for N2-probed surface properties of natural sorbents[J]. Environmental Science and Technology, 2005, 39: 7932-7939.

DOI: 10.1021/es050976h

Google Scholar

[20] PIGNATELLO J J, KWON S, LU Y. Effects of natural organic substances on the surface and adsorptive properties of environmental black carbon (char): attenuation of surface activity by humic and free humic acids[J].Environmental Science and Technology, 2006, 40: 7757-7763.

DOI: 10.1021/es061307m

Google Scholar

[21] ATKINSON C J, FITZGERALD J D, HIPPS N A. Potential mechanisms for achieving agricultural benefits from biochar application to temperate soils: a review[J]. Plant and Soil, 2010, 337: 1-18.

DOI: 10.1007/s11104-010-0464-5

Google Scholar

[22] YIP K V, TIAN F J, HAYASHI J, et al. Effect of alkali and alkaline earth metallic species on biochar reactivity and syngas compositions during steam gasification[J]. Energy and Fuels, 2010, 24: 173-181.

DOI: 10.1021/ef900534n

Google Scholar

[23] LAIRD D A. The charcoal vision: A win-win-win scenario for simultaneously producing bioenergy, permanently sequestering carbon,while improving soil and water quality[J]. Agronomy Journal, 2008,100: 178-181.

DOI: 10.2134/agrojnl2007.0161

Google Scholar

[24] YUAN Jinhua, XU Renkou. Effects of rice hull based biochar regulating acidity of red soil and yellow brown soil[J]. Journal of Ecology and Rural Environment, 2010, 26(5): 472-476.

Google Scholar

[25] CHAN K Y, VAN ZWIETEN L, MESZAROS I, et al. Agronomic values of greenwaste biochar as a soil amendment[J]. Australian Journal of Soil Research, 2007, 45: 629-634.

DOI: 10.1071/sr07109

Google Scholar

[26] NOVAK J M, BUSSCHER W J, LAIRD D L, et al. Impact of biochar amendment on fertility of a southeastern coastal plain soil[J]. Soil Science, 2009, 174: 105-112. Attachment 1 Note; A Rice hull, B Rice hull biochar, C Peanut hull, D Peanut hull biochar, E Maize straw, F Maize straw biochar Attachment 2 Note; A Mushroom matrix, B Mushroom matrix biochar, C Rice straw, D Rice straw biochar, E Corn- cob, F Corncob biochar.

DOI: 10.7717/peerj.9267/table-2

Google Scholar