Super-High Dimension Complex Functions Optimization Using Adaptive Particle Swarm Optimizer

Article Preview

Abstract:

Due to the existence of large numbers of local and global optima of super-high dimension complex functions, general Particle Swarm Optimizer (PSO) methods are slow speed on convergence and easy to be trapped in local optima. In this paper, an Adaptive Particle Swarm Optimizer(APSO) is proposed, which employ an adaptive inertia factor and dynamic changes strategy of search space and velocity in each cycle to plan large-scale space global search and refined local search as a whole according to the fitness change of swarm in optimization process of the functions, and to quicken convergence speed, avoid premature problem, economize computational expenses, and obtain global optimum. We test the proposed algorithm and compare it with other published methods on several super-high dimension complex functions, the experimental results demonstrate that this revised algorithm can rapidly converge at high quality solutions.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 532-533)

Pages:

1830-1835

Citation:

Online since:

June 2012

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2012 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] J. Kennedy, and R.C. Eberhart. Particle swarm optimization. Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Neural Networks. Piscataway, NJ: IEEE Press Center (1995): 1942-(1948).

Google Scholar

[2] Clerc, and J. Kennedy. The particle swarm: explosion, stability, and convergence in a multi-dimensional complex space. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, 1(2002): 58-73.

DOI: 10.1109/4235.985692

Google Scholar

[3] X. Hu, R.C. Eberhart, and Y. H. Shi. Engineering optimization with particle swarm. Proceedings of the IEEE Swarm Intelligence Symposium, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA (2003) : 53-57.

DOI: 10.1109/sis.2003.1202247

Google Scholar

[4] Y.H. Shi, and R.C. Eberhart. Empirical study of particle swarm optimization. Proceedings of the IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation, Piscataway, NJ: IEEE Press Center (1999): 1945~(1950).

Google Scholar

[5] Y. H. Shi, and R.C. Eberhart. A modified particle swarm optimizer. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation, Piscataway, NJ: IEEE Press Center (1998): 69-73.

DOI: 10.1109/icec.1998.699146

Google Scholar

[6] Angeline, P. Using selection to improve particle swarm optimization. Proceedings of IJCNN'99, Washington USA (1999): 84-89.

Google Scholar

[7] Eberhart,R. C., and Kennedy, J. A new optimizer using particles swarm theory. Proc. Sixth International Symposium on Micro Machine and Human Science (Nagoya, Japan), IEEE Service Center, Piscataway (1995): 39-43.

DOI: 10.1109/mhs.1995.494215

Google Scholar

[8] Kaiyou Lei, Yuhui Qiu and Yi He. A new adaptive well-chosen inertia weight strategy to automatically harmonize global and local search ability in particle swarm optimization. 1st International Symposium on Systems and Control in Aerospace and Astronautics, Harbin, China (2006).

DOI: 10.1109/isscaa.2006.1627487

Google Scholar

[9] Chen Bing-rui, Feng Xia-ting. Particle swarm optimization with contracted ranges of both search space and velocity. Journal of Northeastern University (Natural Science), 5(2005): 488-491.

Google Scholar

[10] Wang Jun-wei, Wang Ding-wei. Experiments and analysis on inertia weight in particle swarm optimization. Journal of Systems Engineering, 2(2005): 184-198.

Google Scholar

[11] Zhong Wei-cai, Xue Ming-zhi, et al. Multi-agent genetic algorithm for super-high dimension complex functions optimization. Natural Science Progress, 10(2003): 1078-1083.

Google Scholar

[12] Li Bing-yu, Xiao Yun-shi and Wang Lei. A hybrid particle swarm optimization algorithm for solving complex functions with high dimensions. Information and Control, 1(2004): 27-30.

Google Scholar